Piloting the PuzzleBox Screener for preschool assessment in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

This article explores the shift from Western-based assessment tools to contextually relevant approaches to testing that reflect the experiences of preschool children in South Africa. This study reports on the piloting phase of the newly developed PuzzleBox Screener, with the aim of evaluating the psychometric performance of items to inform decisions on retaining, refining or removing items for the PuzzleBox Screener. The tool uses minimal, recyclable equipment to screen developmental progress in children aged 5 years to 6 years and 11 months in isiXhosa, English and Afrikaans from peri-urban, rural and informal settlements in the culturally diverse Eastern Cape. A quantitative design evaluated 65 children across five developmental domains: cognitive, language, fine motor, socio-emotional and gross motor during the piloting phase. Item selection was determined using a structured approach combining factor loadings from the exploratory factor analysis and item discrimination and difficulty from the item response theory (IRT). Outcomes from this phase included 15 cognitive, 9 fine motor, 12 emotion–social–moral, 12 language and 6 gross motor items, which can be revised or retained. Contribution: The findings indicate that the PuzzleBox Screener can identify developmental delays across the domains investigated in the study using minimal, recyclable equipment. The results support the tool’s feasibility in South Africa and emphasise the need for context-specific measures, innovation and change in early childhood assessment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v7i0.178
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Piloting the PuzzleBox Screener for preschool assessment in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

African Journal of Psychological Assessment
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Piloting the PuzzleBox Screener for preschool assessment in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

article en

Abstract

This article explores the shift from Western-based assessment tools to contextually relevant approaches to testing that reflect the experiences of preschool children in South Africa. This study reports on the piloting phase of the newly developed PuzzleBox Screener, with the aim of evaluating the psychometric performance of items to inform decisions on retaining, refining or removing items for the PuzzleBox Screener. The tool uses minimal, recyclable equipment to screen developmental progress in children aged 5 years to 6 years and 11 months in isiXhosa, English and Afrikaans from peri-urban, rural and informal settlements in the culturally diverse Eastern Cape. A quantitative design evaluated 65 children across five developmental domains: cognitive, language, fine motor, socio-emotional and gross motor during the piloting phase. Item selection was determined using a structured approach combining factor loadings from the exploratory factor analysis and item discrimination and difficulty from the item response theory (IRT). Outcomes from this phase included 15 cognitive, 9 fine motor, 12 emotion–social–moral, 12 language and 6 gross motor items, which can be revised or retained. Contribution: The findings indicate that the PuzzleBox Screener can identify developmental delays across the domains investigated in the study using minimal, recyclable equipment. The results support the tool’s feasibility in South Africa and emphasise the need for context-specific measures, innovation and change in early childhood assessment.

African Journal of Psychological AssessmentVol. 7(0)
University of Fort Hare (ZA), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.