Modeling indoor environmental quality impacts on student comfort and learning in hot-arid educational environment

Purpose The study examines how various indoor environmental quality (IEQ) factors influence student comfort and satisfaction in hot, arid educational settings. Specifically, it investigates: (1) the magnitude of influence of each IEQ factor on student perceptions, (2) the moderating role of thermal comfort and (3) strategies for enhancing classroom environmental quality. Design/methodology/approach This study employs structural equation modeling (SEM) using partial least squares (PLS) to analyze the effects of seven IEQ domains – air quality, thermal comfort, lighting quality, acoustics, ergonomics, aesthetic quality and safety – on student comfort and learning outcomes. A structured questionnaire captured student perceptions at UAE University. The model assessed both direct effects and the moderating influence of thermal comfort on other IEQ components. Findings Thermal comfort (β = 0.362, p < 0.01) and air quality (β = 0.175, p < 0.05) were identified as the most influential IEQ factors contributing to overall student comfort. Lighting quality and safety also demonstrated moderate effects, while acoustics and ergonomics had lesser influence. The model explained 69.2% of the variance in IEQ (R2 = 0.692). Importantly, thermal comfort moderated the impacts of air quality and lighting quality, amplifying their positive effects when thermal conditions were optimal. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to one university and relies on self-reported data, which may introduce subjective bias. Future research should integrate objective environmental measurements and expand the study to multiple institutions or climates. Longitudinal studies could further assess IEQ impacts on academic performance. Originality/value This research provides novel evidence on how integrated IEQ factors affect student comfort in hot, arid climates. It highlights the moderating role of thermal comfort and offers practical guidance for architects, facility managers and policymakers seeking to optimize classroom conditions while promoting energy efficiency and sustainability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-05-2025-0224
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling indoor environmental quality impacts on student comfort and learning in hot-arid educational environment

1 citations
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
8.93
article

Modeling indoor environmental quality impacts on student comfort and learning in hot-arid educational environment

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The study examines how various indoor environmental quality (IEQ) factors influence student comfort and satisfaction in hot, arid educational settings. Specifically, it investigates: (1) the magnitude of influence of each IEQ factor on student perceptions, (2) the moderating role of thermal comfort and (3) strategies for enhancing classroom environmental quality. Design/methodology/approach This study employs structural equation modeling (SEM) using partial least squares (PLS) to analyze the effects of seven IEQ domains – air quality, thermal comfort, lighting quality, acoustics, ergonomics, aesthetic quality and safety – on student comfort and learning outcomes. A structured questionnaire captured student perceptions at UAE University. The model assessed both direct effects and the moderating influence of thermal comfort on other IEQ components. Findings Thermal comfort (β = 0.362, p < 0.01) and air quality (β = 0.175, p < 0.05) were identified as the most influential IEQ factors contributing to overall student comfort. Lighting quality and safety also demonstrated moderate effects, while acoustics and ergonomics had lesser influence. The model explained 69.2% of the variance in IEQ (R2 = 0.692). Importantly, thermal comfort moderated the impacts of air quality and lighting quality, amplifying their positive effects when thermal conditions were optimal. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to one university and relies on self-reported data, which may introduce subjective bias. Future research should integrate objective environmental measurements and expand the study to multiple institutions or climates. Longitudinal studies could further assess IEQ impacts on academic performance. Originality/value This research provides novel evidence on how integrated IEQ factors affect student comfort in hot, arid climates. It highlights the moderating role of thermal comfort and offers practical guidance for architects, facility managers and policymakers seeking to optimize classroom conditions while promoting energy efficiency and sustainability.

Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
United Arab Emirates University (AE), UNSW Sydney (AU), Northumbria University (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.