Where Do Scientists' Innovations Come from? The Scientist as Social Being: Determinants of Scientists’ Innovative Work Behavior Based on the Role of Social Relationship Factors

Only a few studies focus on scientists’ innovative work behavior (IWB); thus, this study aims to explore its determinants. The study analyzed the effects of personal factors (learning motivation, professionalism, emotional intelligence, and job competence), job characteristic factors (task identity, job autonomy, feedback, and skill variety), cultural factors (hierarchical culture, group culture, development culture, and learning culture), and relationship factors (internal network, external network, leader support, and coworker support) on scientists’ IWB. To this end, we collected data by conducting a survey. The model developed in this study focuses on the direct and indirect roles of relationship factors. A total of 1,200 scientists in Korea were selected for the sample, using a proportional distribution method. Based on age and gender, stratified by research institutes (both public and private) and universities. Out of 1,172 valid samples, the responses of 849 scientists were finally analyzed. The variables included learning motivation, professionalism, job competence, task identity, skill variety, and external network were derived as determinants of scientists’ IWB. In addition, personal and job characteristics primarily influenced this behavior. Furthermore, the internal network, external network, leader support, and coworker support moderated the relationship between innovative work behavior and its antecedents. These findings imply that scientists’ IWB is enhanced not only by personal resources, better job design, and cultural capital but also by social relationship support, which facilitates or buffers personal, job, and cultural factors.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387168
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where Do Scientists' Innovations Come from? The Scientist as Social Being: Determinants of Scientists’ Innovative Work Behavior Based on the Role of Social Relationship Factors

SAGE Open
Career Development and Diversity
article

Where Do Scientists' Innovations Come from? The Scientist as Social Being: Determinants of Scientists’ Innovative Work Behavior Based on the Role of Social Relationship Factors

article en

Abstract

Only a few studies focus on scientists’ innovative work behavior (IWB); thus, this study aims to explore its determinants. The study analyzed the effects of personal factors (learning motivation, professionalism, emotional intelligence, and job competence), job characteristic factors (task identity, job autonomy, feedback, and skill variety), cultural factors (hierarchical culture, group culture, development culture, and learning culture), and relationship factors (internal network, external network, leader support, and coworker support) on scientists’ IWB. To this end, we collected data by conducting a survey. The model developed in this study focuses on the direct and indirect roles of relationship factors. A total of 1,200 scientists in Korea were selected for the sample, using a proportional distribution method. Based on age and gender, stratified by research institutes (both public and private) and universities. Out of 1,172 valid samples, the responses of 849 scientists were finally analyzed. The variables included learning motivation, professionalism, job competence, task identity, skill variety, and external network were derived as determinants of scientists’ IWB. In addition, personal and job characteristics primarily influenced this behavior. Furthermore, the internal network, external network, leader support, and coworker support moderated the relationship between innovative work behavior and its antecedents. These findings imply that scientists’ IWB is enhanced not only by personal resources, better job design, and cultural capital but also by social relationship support, which facilitates or buffers personal, job, and cultural factors.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
Ajou University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.