Navigating Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning: Unveiling the Impact of Gradeless Assessment

Background: Traditional grading systems often undermine intrinsic motivation and learner autonomy in language education, prompting interest in alternatives like gradeless assessment. While descriptive feedback and self-correction show promise in enhancing learner development, their impact on specific motivational constructs, such as ideal and ought-to L2 selves, remains underexplored, particularly in non-Western EFL contexts. This study addresses this gap by examining how gradeless assessment influences motivation and autonomy, contributing to global debates on formative assessment practices. Purpose: This study examines the effects of a gradeless assessment approach, utilizing descriptive feedback and self-correction, compared to conventional grading, on the motivation (ideal and ought-to L2 selves) and autonomy of EFL learners. It aims to address the pedagogical challenge of designing assessments that foster sustained motivation and learner agency, particularly in diverse educational settings like Iran, to inform global language education practices. Method: Forty-one upper-intermediate EFL students, selected via the Quick Placement Test, were randomly assigned to an experimental (gradeless, n=21) or control (graded, n=20) group for a reading and writing course. Both groups received identical instruction and materials from the same instructor, differing only in assessment: the experimental group received written descriptive feedback with self-correction opportunities, while the control group received numerical grades. Pre- and post-test questionnaires assessed motivation and autonomy, with data analyzed using independent-sample t-tests. Results: The gradeless approach significantly enhanced ideal L2 self-motivation (t = -2.70, p < .05, η² = .15, 9.8% mean increase) and autonomy (t = -2.06, p < .05, η² = .15.1% mean increase), but reduced ought-to L2 self-motivation (t = 3.05, p < .01, η² = 6.2 % mean decrease), suggesting a shift toward ideal L2 self-motivation. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of gradeless, feedback-oriented assessment to foster intrinsic motivation and autonomy in Iranian EFL contexts, suggesting a need to reconsider traditional grading in favor of formative strategies. However, due to the study’s cultural and contextual specificity, generalizability should be approached cautiously, warranting further research across diverse settings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of language and Education
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.18317
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning: Unveiling the Impact of Gradeless Assessment

Journal of language and Education
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Navigating Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning: Unveiling the Impact of Gradeless Assessment

article en

Abstract

Background: Traditional grading systems often undermine intrinsic motivation and learner autonomy in language education, prompting interest in alternatives like gradeless assessment. While descriptive feedback and self-correction show promise in enhancing learner development, their impact on specific motivational constructs, such as ideal and ought-to L2 selves, remains underexplored, particularly in non-Western EFL contexts. This study addresses this gap by examining how gradeless assessment influences motivation and autonomy, contributing to global debates on formative assessment practices. Purpose: This study examines the effects of a gradeless assessment approach, utilizing descriptive feedback and self-correction, compared to conventional grading, on the motivation (ideal and ought-to L2 selves) and autonomy of EFL learners. It aims to address the pedagogical challenge of designing assessments that foster sustained motivation and learner agency, particularly in diverse educational settings like Iran, to inform global language education practices. Method: Forty-one upper-intermediate EFL students, selected via the Quick Placement Test, were randomly assigned to an experimental (gradeless, n=21) or control (graded, n=20) group for a reading and writing course. Both groups received identical instruction and materials from the same instructor, differing only in assessment: the experimental group received written descriptive feedback with self-correction opportunities, while the control group received numerical grades. Pre- and post-test questionnaires assessed motivation and autonomy, with data analyzed using independent-sample t-tests. Results: The gradeless approach significantly enhanced ideal L2 self-motivation (t = -2.70, p < .05, η² = .15, 9.8% mean increase) and autonomy (t = -2.06, p < .05, η² = .15.1% mean increase), but reduced ought-to L2 self-motivation (t = 3.05, p < .01, η² = 6.2 % mean decrease), suggesting a shift toward ideal L2 self-motivation. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of gradeless, feedback-oriented assessment to foster intrinsic motivation and autonomy in Iranian EFL contexts, suggesting a need to reconsider traditional grading in favor of formative strategies. However, due to the study’s cultural and contextual specificity, generalizability should be approached cautiously, warranting further research across diverse settings.

Journal of language and EducationVol. 11(3)
North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd Branch (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.