Tax Reform for Gender Equality: Principles and Lessons from Nepal and Zambia

Tax systems are often assumed to be neutral, yet they can reinforce gender inequalities in practice. This article examines how this inequality is embedded in both the design and administration of tax systems in developing countries using Nepal and Zambia as case studies. The analysis is grounded in a framework drawn from sound principles of economics and public financial administration. The article distinguishes between explicit bias – legal or administrative provisions that directly differentiate between men and women – and implicit bias that arises from seemingly neutral tax rules that reflect and reproduce gendered economic roles. The article uses case studies to illustrate how these biases manifest in income, consumption, and trade taxes as well as in tax and customs administration. It argues that well-designed tax policy and public financial management reforms can raise revenue more efficiently and equitably, support inclusive growth, and advance gender equality. The article concludes with recommendations to align tax policy and administration with gender-equitable development goals.

Publication Details

Journal
Intertax
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2025077
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tax Reform for Gender Equality: Principles and Lessons from Nepal and Zambia

Intertax
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Tax Reform for Gender Equality: Principles and Lessons from Nepal and Zambia

article en

Abstract

Tax systems are often assumed to be neutral, yet they can reinforce gender inequalities in practice. This article examines how this inequality is embedded in both the design and administration of tax systems in developing countries using Nepal and Zambia as case studies. The analysis is grounded in a framework drawn from sound principles of economics and public financial administration. The article distinguishes between explicit bias – legal or administrative provisions that directly differentiate between men and women – and implicit bias that arises from seemingly neutral tax rules that reflect and reproduce gendered economic roles. The article uses case studies to illustrate how these biases manifest in income, consumption, and trade taxes as well as in tax and customs administration. It argues that well-designed tax policy and public financial management reforms can raise revenue more efficiently and equitably, support inclusive growth, and advance gender equality. The article concludes with recommendations to align tax policy and administration with gender-equitable development goals.

IntertaxVol. 53(Issue 12)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.