Reassessment of the energetic value of lignocellulosic biomass in closed carbon cycles

Related to its energetic value, lignocellulosic biomass is typically characterized by its gross and net calorific value. However, while aiming for closed carbon cycles, this characterization does not reflect that organic matter is a carbon carrier providing “green” carbon urgently needed within a defossilized world, where material utilization of carbon for synthesizing carbon-rich materials is pursued. To address this, the assessment of biomass is expanded to include the work required to separate CO 2 from the atmosphere, which is vital for reducing carbon into biopolymers through photosynthesis. A biogenic and a technical pathway are compared to highlight the advantages of biomass utilization. The analysis reveals that relying solely on the calorific value underestimates the true energetic value of biomass in closed carbon cycles. Organic matter is predestined to be used as a carbon source to provide carbon-based materials to maximize the utilization of nature's inherent separation and reduction capabilities. Consequently, a reassessment of the energetic value of biomass is necessary within the context of a non-fossil economy. • Evaluation of lignocellulose biomass via natural and technical synthesis methods. • Minimum CO 2 separation work from air (426 ppm) equals 21.72 kJ/mol. • Lignocellulose's value totals 488.19 kJ/mol from CO 2 capture and chemical reduction. • Technical synthesis effort includes CO 2 separation, H 2 O splitting, and heat release. • Sustainable economies must recognize biomass potential beyond its energy content.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass and Bioenergy
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108581
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessment of the energetic value of lignocellulosic biomass in closed carbon cycles

Biomass and Bioenergy
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Reassessment of the energetic value of lignocellulosic biomass in closed carbon cycles

article en

Abstract

Related to its energetic value, lignocellulosic biomass is typically characterized by its gross and net calorific value. However, while aiming for closed carbon cycles, this characterization does not reflect that organic matter is a carbon carrier providing “green” carbon urgently needed within a defossilized world, where material utilization of carbon for synthesizing carbon-rich materials is pursued. To address this, the assessment of biomass is expanded to include the work required to separate CO 2 from the atmosphere, which is vital for reducing carbon into biopolymers through photosynthesis. A biogenic and a technical pathway are compared to highlight the advantages of biomass utilization. The analysis reveals that relying solely on the calorific value underestimates the true energetic value of biomass in closed carbon cycles. Organic matter is predestined to be used as a carbon source to provide carbon-based materials to maximize the utilization of nature's inherent separation and reduction capabilities. Consequently, a reassessment of the energetic value of biomass is necessary within the context of a non-fossil economy. • Evaluation of lignocellulose biomass via natural and technical synthesis methods. • Minimum CO 2 separation work from air (426 ppm) equals 21.72 kJ/mol. • Lignocellulose's value totals 488.19 kJ/mol from CO 2 capture and chemical reduction. • Technical synthesis effort includes CO 2 separation, H 2 O splitting, and heat release. • Sustainable economies must recognize biomass potential beyond its energy content.

Biomass and BioenergyVol. 206
Universität Hamburg (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.