S-M V1 bold leap in fusion technology

Everything I’ve written here is my personal nonsense. I’m using this as my personal vlog. Or blog. 10-11-441 1 The first version of the fusion reactor has a significant flaw: it will operate, but its efficiency will be around 30–50%, which is low. I understood how the Sun works and decided to completely redesign the fusion reactor. 2 Time itself cannot be rewound, but if, during a transit through a gate inside an unstable black hole, you can move into the future — provided the gates remain operational for a billion years. As long as the gates exist, you can move forward and backward in time; the main thing is not to intersect with yourself. Briefly, in a few words. Update. November 8, 1932 — with the reactor. The reactor started. Successfully. I will send more public information a little later, but for now these are general thoughts. Gates. What are the gates? In my previous works I described that the membrane must be removed, but I did not explain how to apply it. Why remove the metric of the membrane of an unstable black hole and how to make a metric from it. And why a supermagnet is needed here. The essence of it all: the thermonuclear reactor of this concept, if scaled up to large sizes, functions as such. I have designated a place on the BNG. This region could become an entry point into the space of a black hole for transition to any point in the universe. Here is a solution for how to travel through space, through the universe. These are my thoughts. November 6, 22:40 — I looked at the design from a different angle and suddenly realized there are no decent, adequate superconductors. It’s kind of — honestly — a bit of a disaster. For my needs there are no good superconductors that can withstand high pressure, serve as structural/high-mass components, conduct electricity well, and also have good thermal conductivity. Unfortunately, such materials don’t exist, so I had to develop my own alloy. You won’t like this alloy. November 6, 17:11 — My blog, my thoughts.Work on the project is complete. All the necessary components exist; everything can be built. The real question is—who will want to make it happen? The design is fully modular. This reactor can be completely disassembled. To modify any component, there’s no need to build a new version. On a single reactor, you can configure multiple setups—ten, twenty, thirty, even fifty different equipment configurations. In terms of assembly, the structure itself is very simple in detail, yet extremely complex as a system. That’s the core problem with thermonuclear reactors. Nuclear reactors, by comparison—well, those are simple enough that even a monkey could learn to handle them. These are my thoughts. Technical report — November 6, 01:47.There’s been significant progress with the thermonuclear reactor. In version 30, it’s going to be the final one. I’ve started working on the technical documentation bit by bit. It’ll probably come out to at least 4000 pages if everything goes well—or maybe less, maybe around a thousand. Somewhere between 1000 and 4000 pages in total, I’d say. I’ll be closing this project afterward, because what else is there to do? The only thing left is to build it, maybe reduce it to a smaller scale. I might open my own company, submit the idea on Kickstarter, attract people, and just build it myself. As for America—whatever, I’m done. I offered everything, gave them the chance. Now I’ll do it on my own. Slowly, I’ll move on to something else.