OPTIMIZING MOTOR FUNCTION RECOVERY IN STROKE PATIENTS THROUGH STRUCTURED EXERCISE PROGRAMS

Background: Stroke is a major neurological condition that often results in significant motor, cognitive, and functional impairments, impacting daily living activities. Various rehabilitation techniques, including neurofunctional exercises such as Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Bo bath Neurodevelopmental Therapy (NDT), are utilized to enhance recovery. However, the effectiveness of these interventions compared to conventional physical activity remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of neurofunctional exercises versus standard rehabilitation on functional recovery in stroke survivors over a six-month period. Methods: This study was conducted, involving stroke patients who were divided into two groups: one undergoing rehabilitation incorporating neurofunctional exercises (study group, SG) and another engaging in standard physical activity at home (control group, CG). Functional recovery was assessed using the Barthel Scale (BS), Rankin Scale (RS), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline (during hospitalization) and six months’ post-stroke. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for group comparisons and within-group changes. Results: Baseline comparisons indicated significantly higher BS scores in the control group (U = 820.5; p = 0.001), while the study group had significantly greater NIHSS (U = 647.5; p = 0.001) and RS (U = 811.5; p < 0.001) scores. After six months, the CG retained significantly better BS scores than the SG (p = 0.021), while RS was significantly higher in the SG (p = 0.019). No significant between-group differences were observed in NIHSS scores (p = 0.755). Within-group analyses revealed significant improvements in BS for both groups (SG: p < 0.001; CG: p = 0.005), while NIHSS significantly improved only in the CG (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Neurofunctional exercises did not provide substantial additional benefits compared to standard rehabilitation. Patients in the control group demonstrated greater functional improvements in daily activities, suggesting that conventional home-based physical activity may be equally or more effective in stroke recovery. Future research should explore individualized rehabilitation strategies and long-term functional outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17548182
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OPTIMIZING MOTOR FUNCTION RECOVERY IN STROKE PATIENTS THROUGH STRUCTURED EXERCISE PROGRAMS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

OPTIMIZING MOTOR FUNCTION RECOVERY IN STROKE PATIENTS THROUGH STRUCTURED EXERCISE PROGRAMS

article en

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a major neurological condition that often results in significant motor, cognitive, and functional impairments, impacting daily living activities. Various rehabilitation techniques, including neurofunctional exercises such as Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Bo bath Neurodevelopmental Therapy (NDT), are utilized to enhance recovery. However, the effectiveness of these interventions compared to conventional physical activity remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of neurofunctional exercises versus standard rehabilitation on functional recovery in stroke survivors over a six-month period. Methods: This study was conducted, involving stroke patients who were divided into two groups: one undergoing rehabilitation incorporating neurofunctional exercises (study group, SG) and another engaging in standard physical activity at home (control group, CG). Functional recovery was assessed using the Barthel Scale (BS), Rankin Scale (RS), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline (during hospitalization) and six months’ post-stroke. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for group comparisons and within-group changes. Results: Baseline comparisons indicated significantly higher BS scores in the control group (U = 820.5; p = 0.001), while the study group had significantly greater NIHSS (U = 647.5; p = 0.001) and RS (U = 811.5; p < 0.001) scores. After six months, the CG retained significantly better BS scores than the SG (p = 0.021), while RS was significantly higher in the SG (p = 0.019). No significant between-group differences were observed in NIHSS scores (p = 0.755). Within-group analyses revealed significant improvements in BS for both groups (SG: p < 0.001; CG: p = 0.005), while NIHSS significantly improved only in the CG (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Neurofunctional exercises did not provide substantial additional benefits compared to standard rehabilitation. Patients in the control group demonstrated greater functional improvements in daily activities, suggesting that conventional home-based physical activity may be equally or more effective in stroke recovery. Future research should explore individualized rehabilitation strategies and long-term functional outcomes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Alfaisal University (SA), Sulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges (SA), Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SA), Saudi Heart Association (SA), University of Hafr Al-Batin (SA), Saud Al-babtain Cardiac Centre (SA), Ministry of Health (AE), Al Yamamah University (SA), Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA), King Abdullah Medical City (SA), Nile University (EG), University of Tabuk (SA), Jazan University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.