LABORATORY SCREENING FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES AMONG BLOOD DONORS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Abstract Background: Transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs) is a critical threat to blood safety. Recent screening combines serology with nucleic acid testing (NAT) to shorten diagnostic window periods and detect occult infection. Objectives: To synthesize recent evidence on laboratory screening strategies in blood donors, serology (HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-HIV, syphilis) and NAT (HBV DNA, HCV RNA, HIV-1 RNA), and to summarize prevalence, NAT yield, and implementation outcomes. Methods: We followed PRISMA guidance. We included ten original studies that evaluated donor screening outcomes in routine blood-bank settings in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Data extracted included setting, assays, sample size, TTI prevalence, and NAT yield or incremental detection. Results: Seroprevalence in included studies varied by region; HBsAg ranged from 2–10% in African settings and 0.5–2% in parts of Asia, with lower anti-HIV and variable anti-HCV rates. Studies implementing ID-NAT, MP-NAT reported additional yield over serology alone, particularly for HBV DNA in HBsAg-negative donations and early HCV infection. Adoption studies also described feasibility at national or tertiary-centre scale. Conclusions: Combining serology with NAT improves detection of window-period and occult infections and enhances blood safety. Programs should tailor panels to local epidemiology, consider anti-HBc policies where HBV is endemic, and evaluate cost-effectiveness for national scale-up.
Institutions
- Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
- National Court Reporters Association (US)
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
- Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital (SA)
- King Abdulaziz Hospital (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-10-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17548294
- Primary Topic
- Hepatitis B Virus Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00