β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infection.

Importance β-lactam-based surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is the standard for most surgical procedures. Alternatively, and mostly due to allergies, non-β-lactam-based prophylaxis is used. The association between the use of non-β-lactam SAP and an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI) rate has not yet been conclusively described.Objective To assess whether non-β-lactam vs β-lactam prophylaxis is associated with the occurrence of SSI.Design, Setting, And Participants This cohort study was based on the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system of 175 hospitals, including adult patients who underwent a major surgical procedure with SAP administration within 120 minutes prior to incision and postdischarge follow-up from January 2009 to December 2020. Patients with wound contamination class IV were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from July to December 2024.Exposures β-Lactam SAP vs non-β-lactam SAP.Main Outcomes And Measures The main outcome was occurrence of SSI, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to adjust for institutional, patient, and perioperative confounding factors.Results Of 538 976 surveilled patients, 348 885 (196 411 [56.3%] female; median [IQR] age, 63.2 [47.0-73.3] years) fulfilled eligibility criteria. β-Lactam SAP was administered in 342 936 patients (98.3%) and non-β-lactam SAP in 5949 patients (1.7%). SSI was diagnosed in 9507 patients (2.8%) exposed to β-lactam SAP vs 364 patients (6.1%) who received non-β-lactam SAP (P < .001). Non-β-lactam SAP was significantly associated with a higher SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.59-1.99; P < .001) compared with β-lactam SAP. A higher SSI rate for non-β-lactam SAP was found across all procedure types. Secondary analyses found a higher risk of SSI for ciprofloxacin (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.33-1.87; P < .001), vancomycin (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.03-1.86; P = .04), and clindamycin (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.82-2.47; P < .001) compared with β-lactam SAP.Conclusions And Relevance In this large cohort study, administration of non-β-lactam SAP was associated with 1.8-fold higher odds of SSI. These findings suggest that non-β-lactam SAP should be avoided whenever possible. A careful evaluation of patients with reported β-lactam allergy should be performed before administering a second-choice antibiotic.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/92272
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infection.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Surgical site infection prevention
article

β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infection.

article en

Abstract

Importance β-lactam-based surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is the standard for most surgical procedures. Alternatively, and mostly due to allergies, non-β-lactam-based prophylaxis is used. The association between the use of non-β-lactam SAP and an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI) rate has not yet been conclusively described.Objective To assess whether non-β-lactam vs β-lactam prophylaxis is associated with the occurrence of SSI.Design, Setting, And Participants This cohort study was based on the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system of 175 hospitals, including adult patients who underwent a major surgical procedure with SAP administration within 120 minutes prior to incision and postdischarge follow-up from January 2009 to December 2020. Patients with wound contamination class IV were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from July to December 2024.Exposures β-Lactam SAP vs non-β-lactam SAP.Main Outcomes And Measures The main outcome was occurrence of SSI, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to adjust for institutional, patient, and perioperative confounding factors.Results Of 538 976 surveilled patients, 348 885 (196 411 [56.3%] female; median [IQR] age, 63.2 [47.0-73.3] years) fulfilled eligibility criteria. β-Lactam SAP was administered in 342 936 patients (98.3%) and non-β-lactam SAP in 5949 patients (1.7%). SSI was diagnosed in 9507 patients (2.8%) exposed to β-lactam SAP vs 364 patients (6.1%) who received non-β-lactam SAP (P < .001). Non-β-lactam SAP was significantly associated with a higher SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.59-1.99; P < .001) compared with β-lactam SAP. A higher SSI rate for non-β-lactam SAP was found across all procedure types. Secondary analyses found a higher risk of SSI for ciprofloxacin (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.33-1.87; P < .001), vancomycin (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.03-1.86; P = .04), and clindamycin (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.82-2.47; P < .001) compared with β-lactam SAP.Conclusions And Relevance In this large cohort study, administration of non-β-lactam SAP was associated with 1.8-fold higher odds of SSI. These findings suggest that non-β-lactam SAP should be avoided whenever possible. A careful evaluation of patients with reported β-lactam allergy should be performed before administering a second-choice antibiotic.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.