Building a thriving scientific community: Jupyter as a process, not a product

Presentation given at JupyterCon 2025. Abstract:What does a thriving scientific community look like? To truly thrive, scientific communities must have tools that enable them to access and analyze their varied datasets in one place; platforms that facilitate collaboration across disciplines and expertise levels; and the social structures necessary to connect data, tools, and people into a cohesive, interoperable research fabric. Here, we share insights from the CryoCloud JupyterHub community and broader cross-agency collaborations to illustrate the current state of JupyterHub adoption in a highly dynamic scientific domain. Drawing from user surveys, behavioral patterns, and case studies, we show how researchers integrate the cloud into their workflows, and where they are succeeding or struggling. We also distill core design and community principles, and operational challenges in building sustainable research environments. Finally, we identify ongoing gaps and propose a vision for an ideal, boundaryless scientific community, one where scientific tools and Jupyter infrastructure are not isolated products, but flexible, interoperable processes shaped by ongoing collaboration between tool developers, scientists, and cloud engineers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17527630
Primary Topic
Biotechnology and Related Fields
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a thriving scientific community: Jupyter as a process, not a product

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Biotechnology and Related Fields
article

Building a thriving scientific community: Jupyter as a process, not a product

article en

Abstract

Presentation given at JupyterCon 2025. Abstract:What does a thriving scientific community look like? To truly thrive, scientific communities must have tools that enable them to access and analyze their varied datasets in one place; platforms that facilitate collaboration across disciplines and expertise levels; and the social structures necessary to connect data, tools, and people into a cohesive, interoperable research fabric. Here, we share insights from the CryoCloud JupyterHub community and broader cross-agency collaborations to illustrate the current state of JupyterHub adoption in a highly dynamic scientific domain. Drawing from user surveys, behavioral patterns, and case studies, we show how researchers integrate the cloud into their workflows, and where they are succeeding or struggling. We also distill core design and community principles, and operational challenges in building sustainable research environments. Finally, we identify ongoing gaps and propose a vision for an ideal, boundaryless scientific community, one where scientific tools and Jupyter infrastructure are not isolated products, but flexible, interoperable processes shaped by ongoing collaboration between tool developers, scientists, and cloud engineers.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lockheed Martin (United States) (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Colorado School of Mines (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Biotechnology and Related Fields
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.