SEA-Quester Policy Assessment

The European Union-funded SEA-Quester project is conducting exploratory research into newly emerging European and polar blue carbon habitats. This assessment supports these efforts by evaluating how blue carbon is currently acknowledged in national and international climate and biodiversity policy frameworks using the Arctic as a case study. To accomplish this, we analysed national submissions from Arctic Council member states, observer countries, and the European Union, complemented by interviews with relevant in-country representatives. Our analysis shows that blue carbon is acknowledged more widely by observers than by member states of the Arctic Council, and more often in a biodiversity (NBSAP) than in a climate (NDC) context. All interviewees agreed that multiple positive co-benefits could arise from more effective preservation and management of blue carbon ecosystems. While the concept of blue carbon has reached the Arctic to a small extent, it has been primarily associated with coastal ecosystems within international frameworks. Oceanic forms of blue carbon, such as those involving pelagic species, deep-sea ecosystems, and offshore habitats, were recognised in early discussions of blue carbon. However, these oceanic components were not mentioned or specified to a similar extent as were coastal ecosystems in either this analysis or in subsequent policy development and implementation. Although the climate adaptation benefits of coastal and marine ecosystems are acknowledged in scientific research, we observed that international policy frameworks place greater emphasis on their climate change mitigation potential. We briefly explore potential reasons for these patterns, aiming to inform policymakers currently updating their national climate or biodiversity plans. We conclude with observations on science-policy gaps and offer recommended action points. While this assessment focused on the Arctic, the Antarctic could benefit from a similar evaluation, focusing on the role of blue carbon within international policy frameworks relevant for the region to generalise our understanding of polar blue carbon.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17550938
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SEA-Quester Policy Assessment

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Coastal and Marine Management
article

SEA-Quester Policy Assessment

article en

Abstract

The European Union-funded SEA-Quester project is conducting exploratory research into newly emerging European and polar blue carbon habitats. This assessment supports these efforts by evaluating how blue carbon is currently acknowledged in national and international climate and biodiversity policy frameworks using the Arctic as a case study. To accomplish this, we analysed national submissions from Arctic Council member states, observer countries, and the European Union, complemented by interviews with relevant in-country representatives. Our analysis shows that blue carbon is acknowledged more widely by observers than by member states of the Arctic Council, and more often in a biodiversity (NBSAP) than in a climate (NDC) context. All interviewees agreed that multiple positive co-benefits could arise from more effective preservation and management of blue carbon ecosystems. While the concept of blue carbon has reached the Arctic to a small extent, it has been primarily associated with coastal ecosystems within international frameworks. Oceanic forms of blue carbon, such as those involving pelagic species, deep-sea ecosystems, and offshore habitats, were recognised in early discussions of blue carbon. However, these oceanic components were not mentioned or specified to a similar extent as were coastal ecosystems in either this analysis or in subsequent policy development and implementation. Although the climate adaptation benefits of coastal and marine ecosystems are acknowledged in scientific research, we observed that international policy frameworks place greater emphasis on their climate change mitigation potential. We briefly explore potential reasons for these patterns, aiming to inform policymakers currently updating their national climate or biodiversity plans. We conclude with observations on science-policy gaps and offer recommended action points. While this assessment focused on the Arctic, the Antarctic could benefit from a similar evaluation, focusing on the role of blue carbon within international policy frameworks relevant for the region to generalise our understanding of polar blue carbon.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Grid-Arendal (NO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SEA-Quester Policy Assessment · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS