The principle of sincere cooperation as institutional bridge between competition and data protection law?

In digital markets, personal data is increasingly monetized. As a result, the areas of competition and data protection law collide and the competences of enforcers of these fields of law (i.e. competition and data protection authorities) also overlap. These overlapping competences are not problematic per se but trigger a need for cross-disciplinary cooperation between data protection and competition authorities. Despite this need for cooperation, the EU framework does not provide any specific rules on the interaction between competition and data protection authorities and the CJEU derives certain obligations to cooperate from the principle of sincere cooperation. This paper assesses whether this approach is apt to facilitate cooperation between competition and data protection authorities in the EU. To this end, the paper studies the need for cooperation, the (lack of) existing frameworks for cooperation and the relevance of the principle of sincere cooperation. Furthermore, by identifying the main gaps and open questions associated with the institutional framework, the paper uncovers existing problems relating to cross-disciplinary cooperation between data protection and competition authorities. The absence of a forum for cooperation and the lack of a legal basis to share information are major problems posing obstacles to effective cross-disciplinary cooperation. The EU legislator should fill these gaps in the institutional framework by harmonizing the inter-jurisdictional interaction between competition and data protection authorities.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2025.17994
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The principle of sincere cooperation as institutional bridge between competition and data protection law?

Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

The principle of sincere cooperation as institutional bridge between competition and data protection law?

article en

Abstract

In digital markets, personal data is increasingly monetized. As a result, the areas of competition and data protection law collide and the competences of enforcers of these fields of law (i.e. competition and data protection authorities) also overlap. These overlapping competences are not problematic per se but trigger a need for cross-disciplinary cooperation between data protection and competition authorities. Despite this need for cooperation, the EU framework does not provide any specific rules on the interaction between competition and data protection authorities and the CJEU derives certain obligations to cooperate from the principle of sincere cooperation. This paper assesses whether this approach is apt to facilitate cooperation between competition and data protection authorities in the EU. To this end, the paper studies the need for cooperation, the (lack of) existing frameworks for cooperation and the relevance of the principle of sincere cooperation. Furthermore, by identifying the main gaps and open questions associated with the institutional framework, the paper uncovers existing problems relating to cross-disciplinary cooperation between data protection and competition authorities. The absence of a forum for cooperation and the lack of a legal basis to share information are major problems posing obstacles to effective cross-disciplinary cooperation. The EU legislator should fill these gaps in the institutional framework by harmonizing the inter-jurisdictional interaction between competition and data protection authorities.

Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Leiden University (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.