V61 TARDIS 3.1 MASS-CORE-V30

Everything I’ve written here is my personal nonsense. I’m using this as my personal vlog. Or blog. Technical report — November 6, 01:47.There’s been significant progress with the thermonuclear reactor. In version 30, it’s going to be the final one. I’ve started working on the technical documentation bit by bit. It’ll probably come out to at least 4000 pages if everything goes well—or maybe less, maybe around a thousand. Somewhere between 1000 and 4000 pages in total, I’d say. I’ll be closing this project afterward, because what else is there to do? The only thing left is to build it, maybe reduce it to a smaller scale. I might open my own company, submit the idea on Kickstarter, attract people, and just build it myself. As for America—whatever, I’m done. I offered everything, gave them the chance. Now I’ll do it on my own. Slowly, I’ll move on to something else. November 4, 19:31 Eureka, eureka, eureka…So, in version 29, you know what I didn’t like? I didn’t like that the core’s lifespan was only 1000 seconds. That’s bad! How can you build something that lasts only 1000 seconds? That won’t do. Somehow, I managed to extend it—now the project can sustain itself for 1000 days. I don’t even know how many seconds that is, but anyway… plasma stability has been achieved. That’s it. Prototypes, prototypes, prototypes… we just need to build them. But the real question is—who will give me the resources and opportunity? In the U.S.? I’ve been writing to the embassy—sent two or three messages already, even some drafts of blueprints—zero response. Wrote to DARPA—no reply. Wherever I write—it’s like a wall. I swear, a wall. Try breaking through yourself—see if you succeed. I don’t know—maybe somewhere in Europe? But who would dare to build an experimental thermonuclear reactor with such functions and control systems? Who’s that crazy? I don’t know… Germany is too conservative. England too. And yet the project isn’t that expensive—only about 1.5 billion for one iteration. The related costs, of course, require new specialists in quantum engineering, new fields, new knowledge. All of that needs to be developed. The problem with superconductors seems mostly solved—but the design itself is a mess. Total chaos. Still, it’s far better than ITER—maybe millions of times better. Those “donuts,” those endless donuts… what’s with that obsession? I opened Wikipedia, and it’s just donuts everywhere. You’ve been building them for seventy years—since Sakharov or whoever came up with them—and you keep building and building, and still nothing works, and you don’t understand why. I’ve never seen a star shaped like that. You’re making some kind of Frankenstein’s monster. No offense—but it’s silly to build what doesn’t exist, and then artificially try to make it live. Of course it won’t. These are my thoughts. These are my thoughts, November 4, 15:52.In essence, the reactor works. These are metric data taken from the prototype readings. Secondly, in serial production reactors the size can already be reduced, and additional properties can be modeled as needed. One type of core functions as a quantum computer. The second could operate as a thermonuclear reactor. The third—I’m not sure yet. Quantum entanglement: it’s possible to create quantum entanglement between two cores. That would be a perfect quantum link. You could stimulate the behavior of one core through the other, transferring data by altering one of them. Something like that. It sounds strange, but it’s all feasible. The metrics I mentioned—the gates and the rest—are indeed achievable. But first: for those observing space, we need to find the most unstable black hole, with a mass of about 2.2 solar masses but the highest possible spin. That one might be the fastest. Then we’d need to record the metrics of its membrane. Those metrics could be used to construct the gates—based on thermonuclear reactor principles. But it would require more than one reactor, since the power and energy needed to emulate the membrane of an unstable black hole are enormous. Second, we need deuterium. This reactor is like a Formula 1 engine—it won’t run on just anything; it needs high-quality fuel. Third, it can be scaled to any size. You can generate as much energy as you want—however much you decide, that’s how much you’ll get. Want a 50-meter sphere? You’ll have a 50-meter sphere. Want small 5-centimeter spheres? If possible, yes—even 5 centimeters. Something like that. These are my thoughts. November 4, 06:52. I’ve updated the project and it’s starting to take shape. I pulled the key technical parameters into a separate table and compared them with ITER. Take a look and judge for yourselves. Update — November 3, 03:06 At the V27 stage of development—building on investigations in V26 and V27—I realized I can merge my two projects. I wanted a quantum super-processor and I wanted a thermonuclear reactor, and I’ve managed to combine them. The resulting specific impulse is about 5,000 seconds. Early simulations show that even at the design/theory stage—without releasing the underlying know-how—the efficiency boost is on the order of 300–500% right from the start. So, folks: keep learning—just not in institutions; learn from within yourself. Hi. These are my thoughts as of November 2, 21:31. I’ve been thinking it over—reading my notes—and I realized the reaction won’t be stable on its own. It will need artificial regulation, i.e., to be driven with pulses. And, long story short, I concluded that the V20 project is fundamentally flawed and has to be reworked. I’ve redone it once, then twice, then a third time—now a fourth—so we’re at V24. The idea is very simple, but the implementation is going to be a nightmare. As for the payoff… I can’t even imagine what the yield would be if this machine were the size of ITER. Hi. Today is November 2, 17:19. So, the progress with the mass-core is going fine. The current status: the project is theoretically ready for construction. Essentially, this design has different levels of application depending on how the machine is configured. In small sizes, it can act as an EM weapon. My assumption is that its power could be incredible, but I’ll deal with that at the end.Right now I’m more interested—after my thermonuclear reactor. Because the Aether, fuck, oh my God, the Aether, fuck! Who the hell builds donuts? Donuts, damn it! Donuts! I don’t remember stars being donut-shaped. Idiots! Who the hell came up with that? A donut, fuck! A fucking donut!Second, in the same area. God forbid, I went just to see what a modern nuclear reactor is. Holy shit! How many nuclear disasters have you had in history? I’m just curious. Especially in the Soviet Union—what they built: graphite crap. Oh fuck. Unbelievable stupidity—honestly, like a suicide device. And some of your reactors still stand like that. It’s a fucking disaster.I don’t like that you end up with waste. There shouldn’t be any waste. The reaction should be self-stabilizing at different stages. But you focused only on uranium and heavy isotopes like plutonium. Idiots. And for the “weak” isotopes you build separate reactors. Why don’t you just put it all into one from the start?These are my thoughts. 3;51 31.10.2025 The universe isn’t empty. My wish is for the human race to survive. But the current pace of development—I don’t like it at all. It’s like information just stands still forever. Everyone’s running around, cramming. Some info, numbers sloshing back and forth. The essence doesn’t change. I’m fucking sick of it. Another reason I started: I’ve reached the stage where the mask of astrophysics, physics, mathematics, logic—I don’t need it anymore. I don’t have to think that way. For a simple reason: everything that could be created within those masks, I’ve already created. I need to change the mask to one that fits better—à la Oppenheimer. It’s time to build. And whoever gives me the opportunity to realize my projects—well, they can decide for themselves what they’ll get out of it. This isn’t for debate—just translate into English. You were searching for gold, but in this case the gold found itself—apparently me as well. For all my subsequent projects, extraordinary resources are required. Those resources exist only in two countries: America and China. That includes everything I know—the full list of what I need. It doesn’t exist as a whole anywhere else, but in both countries, separately, within closed ecosystems, it does. So I won’t have to run around, negotiate, plead, and so on. I don’t like that. I simply love freedom and believe you should sell yourself as well as possible. So the situation is tense and calls for decisive action. I’ll say it outright: I would trade all my titles even for going into slavery—if I could be healthy. To be cured of cancer and leave healthy, yes. I could even be the most hopeless janitor—or, I don’t know, literally a slave. What difference does it make? It’s better than death. If you need knowledge about tunneling weapons, tunneling transitions, quantum entanglement, quantum processors, quantum generators, quantum batteries, virtual black holes, black-hole weapons, black holes for planetary destruction, black holes of system-destruction class—anything based on this technology. It works as transport, as a source in itself, and as a stabilizer. That is, it’s also a mass damper. Infinite densities and masses. And I don’t know—the applications of this technology are countless. Everything depends on power. So, the essence of it all is this: I live one day at a time. In my head… I’m not like people think or imagine. I have five columns in my mind when I picture something. In those five columns there are levels. Each level is some variation of the project or document I’m envisioning. And I see which of these variations actually works—what’s truly real—by my own criticism. I’m a very critical person in my life. The greatest critic is me