SEPARATION OF POWERS IN A POST-COLONIAL STATE: A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF MONTESQUIEU AND NIGERIA

Since 1999, when Nigeria made the transition from military rule to civil rule, pundits and careful observers have attributed the poor implementation of the country's democratic process mainly to the breach of separation of powers. The claim is that so much power is vested on the executive arm of government so much so that the other two arms: the legislature and the judiciary are just used as appendages or mere rubber stamps by the executive. The outcome of this state of affairs is an outright recklessness and abuse of power by the executive. It's widely believed that the lack of progress in the country's political and economic systems is occasioned by this executive usurpation since there is an intrinsic link between politics and the economy. Using the method of philosophical analysis, this study applies Baron de Montesquieu's doctrine of the separation of powers to investigate how this ill in the body of Nigerian polity can be remedied. Montesquieu in his Magnus Opus, The Spirit of laws argues that the best way to overcome the dictatorial leadership of antiquity and promote individual's liberty within the state is by ensuring that the powers to make, execute and interpret the laws do not subsist in one person or group of persons. As such, Montesquieu is the first scholar to formally call for and work out the justifications and consequences of the principle of separation of powers which has become the hallmark of modern liberal democracy. To this end, the study discovered that Nigerian democracy because of the over power exercised by the executive does not cohere with the recommendations of The Spirt of Laws. The study also found that the inability of the legislative and judicial to assert their autonomy from the executive is the reason why Nigeria has not been able to make any headway both politically and economically. Based on this, the study recommends the adoption and adaptation of Montesquieu's principle of separation of powers to Nigeria's political system as prerequisites for peace, political and economic developments in the country.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17543143
Primary Topic
African Education and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SEPARATION OF POWERS IN A POST-COLONIAL STATE: A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF MONTESQUIEU AND NIGERIA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
African Education and Politics
article

SEPARATION OF POWERS IN A POST-COLONIAL STATE: A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF MONTESQUIEU AND NIGERIA

article en

Abstract

Since 1999, when Nigeria made the transition from military rule to civil rule, pundits and careful observers have attributed the poor implementation of the country's democratic process mainly to the breach of separation of powers. The claim is that so much power is vested on the executive arm of government so much so that the other two arms: the legislature and the judiciary are just used as appendages or mere rubber stamps by the executive. The outcome of this state of affairs is an outright recklessness and abuse of power by the executive. It's widely believed that the lack of progress in the country's political and economic systems is occasioned by this executive usurpation since there is an intrinsic link between politics and the economy. Using the method of philosophical analysis, this study applies Baron de Montesquieu's doctrine of the separation of powers to investigate how this ill in the body of Nigerian polity can be remedied. Montesquieu in his Magnus Opus, The Spirit of laws argues that the best way to overcome the dictatorial leadership of antiquity and promote individual's liberty within the state is by ensuring that the powers to make, execute and interpret the laws do not subsist in one person or group of persons. As such, Montesquieu is the first scholar to formally call for and work out the justifications and consequences of the principle of separation of powers which has become the hallmark of modern liberal democracy. To this end, the study discovered that Nigerian democracy because of the over power exercised by the executive does not cohere with the recommendations of The Spirt of Laws. The study also found that the inability of the legislative and judicial to assert their autonomy from the executive is the reason why Nigeria has not been able to make any headway both politically and economically. Based on this, the study recommends the adoption and adaptation of Montesquieu's principle of separation of powers to Nigeria's political system as prerequisites for peace, political and economic developments in the country.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nnamdi Azikiwe University (NG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
African Education and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.