Organizational learning with artificial intelligence: Balancing new tensions between explorative and exploitative learning through hybridization

To realize the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), organizations must manage the paradoxical tensions that arise when using it in pursuit of innovation. Studies suggest that the adoption of AI introduces new avenues for explorative and exploitative learning in organizations, prompting a reassessment of how these competing learning modes interact. Drawing on interview data, we identify a set of new tensions that arise when AI is used to support organizational learning. We conceptualize these tensions as paradoxes of autonomy (autonomy vs. control), rationality (formal vs. substantive), transparency (opacity vs. accountability), and opportunity (internal vs. external learning). We contribute to the emerging literature on the role of AI in organizational learning by showing why organizational learning with AI benefits from a hybridization approach that integrates the distinctive yet complementary learning capacities of humans and AI. Hybridization creates conditions to enact coping solutions for the paradoxes identified. • Explores new tensions arising from explorative and exploitative learning with AI. • Interviews revealed four AI-related paradoxes. • Organizational learning benefits from a balanced integration of human and AI learning affordances. • Hybridization enables human-AI collaborative agency to navigate the organizational learning paradoxes of AI. • Offers suggestions for managing organizational learning with AI in practice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Management
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102997
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizational learning with artificial intelligence: Balancing new tensions between explorative and exploitative learning through hybridization

1 citations
International Journal of Information Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Organizational learning with artificial intelligence: Balancing new tensions between explorative and exploitative learning through hybridization

article en
1 citations

Abstract

To realize the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), organizations must manage the paradoxical tensions that arise when using it in pursuit of innovation. Studies suggest that the adoption of AI introduces new avenues for explorative and exploitative learning in organizations, prompting a reassessment of how these competing learning modes interact. Drawing on interview data, we identify a set of new tensions that arise when AI is used to support organizational learning. We conceptualize these tensions as paradoxes of autonomy (autonomy vs. control), rationality (formal vs. substantive), transparency (opacity vs. accountability), and opportunity (internal vs. external learning). We contribute to the emerging literature on the role of AI in organizational learning by showing why organizational learning with AI benefits from a hybridization approach that integrates the distinctive yet complementary learning capacities of humans and AI. Hybridization creates conditions to enact coping solutions for the paradoxes identified. • Explores new tensions arising from explorative and exploitative learning with AI. • Interviews revealed four AI-related paradoxes. • Organizational learning benefits from a balanced integration of human and AI learning affordances. • Hybridization enables human-AI collaborative agency to navigate the organizational learning paradoxes of AI. • Offers suggestions for managing organizational learning with AI in practice.

International Journal of Information ManagementVol. 86
University of Auckland (NZ)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.