Simulation of the ion profile monitors in the Brookhaven AGS

Ion profile monitors (IPMs) provide a non-destructive means of measuring the transverse beam size of a passing ion beam in a particle accelerator. The Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) at Brookhaven National Lab is equipped with two types of IPMs: ion-collecting and electron-collecting. While ion-collecting IPMs are susceptible to significant distortions in the measured beam size due to the space charge of the passing beam, electron-collecting IPMs are much less affected. However, in the AGS, electron-collecting IPMs can only be operated periodically to preserve sensor lifespan, leaving ion IPMs as the sole source of consistent, real-time beam size feedback during operation. In this work, WarpX simulations of IPM operation are used to characterize the measured beam size as a function of beam parameters and IPM operating conditions. These simulations are then compared against experimental data collected from both ion and electron IPMs in the AGS. The findings aim to refine correction factors, enabling more accurate beam size estimations from ion IPM measurements, ultimately improving beam diagnostics and operational efficiency.

Publication Details

Journal
JACOW
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18429/jacow-ipac2025-mops082
Primary Topic
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation of the ion profile monitors in the Brookhaven AGS

JACOW
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
article

Simulation of the ion profile monitors in the Brookhaven AGS

article en

Abstract

Ion profile monitors (IPMs) provide a non-destructive means of measuring the transverse beam size of a passing ion beam in a particle accelerator. The Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) at Brookhaven National Lab is equipped with two types of IPMs: ion-collecting and electron-collecting. While ion-collecting IPMs are susceptible to significant distortions in the measured beam size due to the space charge of the passing beam, electron-collecting IPMs are much less affected. However, in the AGS, electron-collecting IPMs can only be operated periodically to preserve sensor lifespan, leaving ion IPMs as the sole source of consistent, real-time beam size feedback during operation. In this work, WarpX simulations of IPM operation are used to characterize the measured beam size as a function of beam parameters and IPM operating conditions. These simulations are then compared against experimental data collected from both ion and electron IPMs in the AGS. The findings aim to refine correction factors, enabling more accurate beam size estimations from ion IPM measurements, ultimately improving beam diagnostics and operational efficiency.

JACOW
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.