Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility in Times of Armed Conflict

The article explores the emerging concept of “geopolitical responsibility,” suggesting that companies may play an active role in shaping or intensifying international conflicts through their economic activities. It traces how this idea builds on existing soft law instruments, such as the UN Guiding Principles and OECD Guidelines, that in fact call for heightened corporate due diligence in conflict-affected areas. However, binding legal frameworks like the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive focus on human rights and environmental risks within supply chains, leaving the geopolitical dimension largely unaddressed. Against this backdrop, the concept of geopolitical responsibility remains largely theoretical but reflects a growing expectation that companies critically assess the broader political and security implications of their global business operations.

Publication Details

Journal
IntRechtDok
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17176/20251106-092301-0
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility in Times of Armed Conflict

IntRechtDok
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility in Times of Armed Conflict

article en

Abstract

The article explores the emerging concept of “geopolitical responsibility,” suggesting that companies may play an active role in shaping or intensifying international conflicts through their economic activities. It traces how this idea builds on existing soft law instruments, such as the UN Guiding Principles and OECD Guidelines, that in fact call for heightened corporate due diligence in conflict-affected areas. However, binding legal frameworks like the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive focus on human rights and environmental risks within supply chains, leaving the geopolitical dimension largely unaddressed. Against this backdrop, the concept of geopolitical responsibility remains largely theoretical but reflects a growing expectation that companies critically assess the broader political and security implications of their global business operations.

IntRechtDok
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.