Accuracy of PET Imaging and Ultrasonography for Preoperative Staging of Cervical Lymph Node Status in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: Cervical lymph node status is the strongest prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). While 18F-FDG-PET and cervical ultrasonography are widely used for preoperative staging, their diagnostic accuracy remains limited for small or equivocal nodes. This study compared both modalities against histopathology on a per-level basis and examined correlations of SUVmax and RECIST values with metastatic involvement. Methods: This retrospective single-centre study included patients with histologically confirmed OSCC who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG-PET and cervical ultrasonography, followed by resection and neck dissection (October 2018–December 2024). Imaging was interpreted independently and blinded to clinical and histopathological data. Histopathology served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed on a level-by-level basis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated and compared using McNemar’s test and logistic regression. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10.6 years; 54% male, 46% female), the lateral tongue was the most frequent site (44%), and 31% showed nodal involvement on PET imaging. PET imaging yielded 59% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and 77% accuracy; ultrasonography achieved higher sensitivity (76%) but lower specificity (67%). Combined assessment improved sensitivity (78%) and NPV (82%) but reduced specificity. PET imaging was more specific, while ultrasonography was more sensitive. SUVmax and RECIST values were higher in metastatic nodes and independently predicted metastasis, though with substantial overlap and no reliable cut-off. Conclusions: PET imaging offers higher specificity, whereas ultrasonography provides greater sensitivity. Their complementary performance supports a multimodal approach to cervical staging in OSCC. Neither SUVmax nor RECIST values reliably distinguished benign from malignant lymph nodes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211880
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of PET Imaging and Ultrasonography for Preoperative Staging of Cervical Lymph Node Status in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

1 citations
Applied Sciences
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
1.85
article

Accuracy of PET Imaging and Ultrasonography for Preoperative Staging of Cervical Lymph Node Status in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical lymph node status is the strongest prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). While 18F-FDG-PET and cervical ultrasonography are widely used for preoperative staging, their diagnostic accuracy remains limited for small or equivocal nodes. This study compared both modalities against histopathology on a per-level basis and examined correlations of SUVmax and RECIST values with metastatic involvement. Methods: This retrospective single-centre study included patients with histologically confirmed OSCC who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG-PET and cervical ultrasonography, followed by resection and neck dissection (October 2018–December 2024). Imaging was interpreted independently and blinded to clinical and histopathological data. Histopathology served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed on a level-by-level basis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated and compared using McNemar’s test and logistic regression. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10.6 years; 54% male, 46% female), the lateral tongue was the most frequent site (44%), and 31% showed nodal involvement on PET imaging. PET imaging yielded 59% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and 77% accuracy; ultrasonography achieved higher sensitivity (76%) but lower specificity (67%). Combined assessment improved sensitivity (78%) and NPV (82%) but reduced specificity. PET imaging was more specific, while ultrasonography was more sensitive. SUVmax and RECIST values were higher in metastatic nodes and independently predicted metastasis, though with substantial overlap and no reliable cut-off. Conclusions: PET imaging offers higher specificity, whereas ultrasonography provides greater sensitivity. Their complementary performance supports a multimodal approach to cervical staging in OSCC. Neither SUVmax nor RECIST values reliably distinguished benign from malignant lymph nodes.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(22)
University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
1.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.