Stretching Boundaries, Recalibrating Theory: Educational Leadership in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) transforms how K-12 schools manage learning, instruction, and enact leadership, often without comprehensive theoretical guidance. This study critically examines whether ten foundational leadership and organisational behavioural theories remain analytically viable and practically relevant in AI-mediated educational contexts. Employing a conceptual analysis grounded in critical theory and interdisciplinary AI literature, the study evaluates each theory's responsiveness to four conceptual pressures introduced by AI: epistemic disruption, relational mediation, ethical opacity, and diminished human agency. The analysis reveals that while instructional leadership and self-efficacy theories align well with AI's strengths in feedback and personalization, others—such as social justice leadership theory and trust theory—experience conceptual strain. A concentric framework is introduced to assess theoretical adaptability, followed by a five-stage model for improving leadership and organisational behavioural theory. AI is not merely a technological tool but a conceptual stress test for leadership and organisational behavioural theory. This study offers a roadmap for extending and re-contextualizing leadership models to address AI-mediated education's ethical, epistemological, and operational demands. It calls on the education leadership field to shift from theory preservation to theory evolution to remain relevant in an algorithmically governed future.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17541013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stretching Boundaries, Recalibrating Theory: Educational Leadership in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

1 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Education and Society
3.25
article

Stretching Boundaries, Recalibrating Theory: Educational Leadership in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) transforms how K-12 schools manage learning, instruction, and enact leadership, often without comprehensive theoretical guidance. This study critically examines whether ten foundational leadership and organisational behavioural theories remain analytically viable and practically relevant in AI-mediated educational contexts. Employing a conceptual analysis grounded in critical theory and interdisciplinary AI literature, the study evaluates each theory's responsiveness to four conceptual pressures introduced by AI: epistemic disruption, relational mediation, ethical opacity, and diminished human agency. The analysis reveals that while instructional leadership and self-efficacy theories align well with AI's strengths in feedback and personalization, others—such as social justice leadership theory and trust theory—experience conceptual strain. A concentric framework is introduced to assess theoretical adaptability, followed by a five-stage model for improving leadership and organisational behavioural theory. AI is not merely a technological tool but a conceptual stress test for leadership and organisational behavioural theory. This study offers a roadmap for extending and re-contextualizing leadership models to address AI-mediated education's ethical, epistemological, and operational demands. It calls on the education leadership field to shift from theory preservation to theory evolution to remain relevant in an algorithmically governed future.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Georgia State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Education and Society
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.