Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of emerging circular flexible plastic food and non-food packaging

Closed-loop recycling of food (F) and non-food (NF) multi-material multilayer (MuMu) flexible plastic packaging remains challenging for state-of-the-art technologies hence it is currently incinerated and landfilled (baseline). Two innovative recycling scenarios are compared, using a basket-of-products approach for LCA and LCC: one producing NF packaging and another producing both F and NF packaging enabled by tracer technology. This involves advanced mechanical and physical recycling, followed by the production of novel polyethylene (PE)-based mono-material multilayer packaging with PE post-consumer recyclates (PCR), compared against the baseline. The innovative scenarios outperform the baseline across climate change, fossil and minerals and metals resource use, freshwater ecotoxicity, particulate matter, and acidification achieving 16 % to 52 % impact reductions, with LCC results showing a similar trend (41–49 %). The loops are not fully closed in mass terms, due to losses but also laminate design with PCR is challenging and does not enable full uptake.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108674
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of emerging circular flexible plastic food and non-food packaging

3 citations
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.51
article

Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of emerging circular flexible plastic food and non-food packaging

article en
3 citations

Abstract

Closed-loop recycling of food (F) and non-food (NF) multi-material multilayer (MuMu) flexible plastic packaging remains challenging for state-of-the-art technologies hence it is currently incinerated and landfilled (baseline). Two innovative recycling scenarios are compared, using a basket-of-products approach for LCA and LCC: one producing NF packaging and another producing both F and NF packaging enabled by tracer technology. This involves advanced mechanical and physical recycling, followed by the production of novel polyethylene (PE)-based mono-material multilayer packaging with PE post-consumer recyclates (PCR), compared against the baseline. The innovative scenarios outperform the baseline across climate change, fossil and minerals and metals resource use, freshwater ecotoxicity, particulate matter, and acidification achieving 16 % to 52 % impact reductions, with LCC results showing a similar trend (41–49 %). The loops are not fully closed in mass terms, due to losses but also laminate design with PCR is challenging and does not enable full uptake.

Resources Conservation and RecyclingVol. 226
Ghent University (BE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of emerging circular flexible plastic food and non-food packaging · Resources Conservation and Recycling (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS