Membrane effects in reinforced concrete: From experimental evidence to numerical and analytical modelling

The development of membrane effects in reinforced concrete structures allows for significant enhancements in the resistance provided that lateral movements of a structure or sub-assemblage are restricted. First, the restrained dilation of flexural cracking allows developing axial compressive forces, which increase the resistance with respect to an unconfined response, called Compressive Membrane Action (CMA) or Arching Action when referring to linear members. CMA is significant for low levels of displacements and its effect is considered in some design codes (e.g. punching resistance in EN1992–1–1:2023). For higher levels of displacement, the member elongates and the compressive forces reduce, becoming eventually in tension and activating the so-called Tensile Membrane Action (TMA). TMA has traditionally been widely considered for robustness considerations (response after accidental actions such as column removal). In this paper, a consistent treatment of CMA and TMA on reinforced concrete sub-assemblages of linear members is presented. First, a database of 56 tests is compiled, filtered and digitalized in terms of the load-displacement curve (covering a wide range of heights (90–660 mm), reinforcement ratios (0.31–1.3 %) and slenderness ratios (4−27)). By analysis of the test results and interpretation using refined finite element simulations, the phenomena underlying the activation of CMA and TMA are investigated and quantified. On this basis, a general approach grounded on limit analysis is presented, both for CMA and TMA, and providing sound and consistent agreement to the test results. This approach enables simple analytical expressions for design, covering different ranges of displacement and thus providing a consistent transition from CMA to TMA. Its predictions show in addition low scatter when compared to test results, smaller than several other approaches currently available in the literature. • A database of 42 RC sub-assemblage tests is compiled and analysed to study CMA and TMA behaviour. • A unified approach for CMA and TMA is developed using limit analysis and validated with experiments. • Detailed finite element models are used to interpret test results and investigate CMA and TMA mechanisms. • Failure mode depends on axial restraint, geometry, and reinforcement ductility and detailing.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121710
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Membrane effects in reinforced concrete: From experimental evidence to numerical and analytical modelling

Engineering Structures
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Membrane effects in reinforced concrete: From experimental evidence to numerical and analytical modelling

article en

Abstract

The development of membrane effects in reinforced concrete structures allows for significant enhancements in the resistance provided that lateral movements of a structure or sub-assemblage are restricted. First, the restrained dilation of flexural cracking allows developing axial compressive forces, which increase the resistance with respect to an unconfined response, called Compressive Membrane Action (CMA) or Arching Action when referring to linear members. CMA is significant for low levels of displacements and its effect is considered in some design codes (e.g. punching resistance in EN1992–1–1:2023). For higher levels of displacement, the member elongates and the compressive forces reduce, becoming eventually in tension and activating the so-called Tensile Membrane Action (TMA). TMA has traditionally been widely considered for robustness considerations (response after accidental actions such as column removal). In this paper, a consistent treatment of CMA and TMA on reinforced concrete sub-assemblages of linear members is presented. First, a database of 56 tests is compiled, filtered and digitalized in terms of the load-displacement curve (covering a wide range of heights (90–660 mm), reinforcement ratios (0.31–1.3 %) and slenderness ratios (4−27)). By analysis of the test results and interpretation using refined finite element simulations, the phenomena underlying the activation of CMA and TMA are investigated and quantified. On this basis, a general approach grounded on limit analysis is presented, both for CMA and TMA, and providing sound and consistent agreement to the test results. This approach enables simple analytical expressions for design, covering different ranges of displacement and thus providing a consistent transition from CMA to TMA. Its predictions show in addition low scatter when compared to test results, smaller than several other approaches currently available in the literature. • A database of 42 RC sub-assemblage tests is compiled and analysed to study CMA and TMA behaviour. • A unified approach for CMA and TMA is developed using limit analysis and validated with experiments. • Detailed finite element models are used to interpret test results and investigate CMA and TMA mechanisms. • Failure mode depends on axial restraint, geometry, and reinforcement ductility and detailing.

Engineering StructuresVol. 347
Japan Real Estate Institute (JP), BG Consulting Engineers (Switzerland) (CH), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.