Effects of Participatory Budgeting and Transparency on Budget Allocation Outcomes in South Korea

Despite a growing literature stream, debates con­tinue regarding the effects of citizen participation in public budgeting on budget allocation outcomes. This study addresses this research gap by analyzing data from the early stages of mandatory participa­tory budgeting implementation in South Korea and providing empirical evidence. It examines the effects of two independent variables: participatory budget­ing maturity and enhanced transparency through information disclosure. These factors are hypothe­sized to influence budget allocation by shifting de­cision-making power from bureaucrats to citizens. This study models these effects as sequential in­teractions, showing that increased citizen involve­ment results in a statistically significant increase in social expenditures, including welfare, education, and health services, while having a smaller effect on administrative expenses. Information disclosure fur­ther reduces participation costs, thereby enhancing the overall effect of participatory budgeting on pro­moting more equitable public resource distribution.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.76e.8
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Participatory Budgeting and Transparency on Budget Allocation Outcomes in South Korea

Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Effects of Participatory Budgeting and Transparency on Budget Allocation Outcomes in South Korea

article en

Abstract

Despite a growing literature stream, debates con­tinue regarding the effects of citizen participation in public budgeting on budget allocation outcomes. This study addresses this research gap by analyzing data from the early stages of mandatory participa­tory budgeting implementation in South Korea and providing empirical evidence. It examines the effects of two independent variables: participatory budget­ing maturity and enhanced transparency through information disclosure. These factors are hypothe­sized to influence budget allocation by shifting de­cision-making power from bureaucrats to citizens. This study models these effects as sequential in­teractions, showing that increased citizen involve­ment results in a statistically significant increase in social expenditures, including welfare, education, and health services, while having a smaller effect on administrative expenses. Information disclosure fur­ther reduces participation costs, thereby enhancing the overall effect of participatory budgeting on pro­moting more equitable public resource distribution.

Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences(76 E)
Dongguk University (KR), Konkuk University (KR), Jeju National University (KR)
Jeju National University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of Participatory Budgeting and Transparency on Budget Allocation Outcomes in South Korea · Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS