The Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

A multitude of studies have investigated the identification of unique antigens and genetic traits associated with cardiac stem cells (CSCs) since their discovery. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac stem cells (CSCs), elucidate existing knowledge regarding their potential applications, and compare them with other novel therapeutic strategies for cardiac repair, including bone marrow cells (BMCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Researchers conducted a search of important indexing databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, and Embase, to identify pertinent papers published from 1980 to January 2025. A total of 74 studies involving 5,420 participants were selected from 459 evaluated for the study. A total of 2,931 participants were allocated to the intervention group, whereas 2,489 were assigned to the placebo or control groups. The research encompassed 49 papers on BMC therapy, 17 on MSC therapy, five on CSC therapy, and three on ADRC therapy. A 0.4% enhancement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.23-0.57; I2: 85%, P < 0.00001] was noted after stem cell therapy and in the stem cell therapy cohort, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) diminished by -0.33 mL (95% CI: -0.47 to -0.19; I2: 73%, P < 0.00001), whereas left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) reduced by -0.18 mL (95% CI: -0.31 to -0.05; I2: 68%, P = 0.006). Furthermore, in this cohort, the six-minute walk test (6MWT) exhibited an increase of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.06-0.34; I2: 0%, P = 0.005), whereas the standardized mean difference of infarct size (IS) demonstrated a reduction of -0.36% (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.12; I2: 68%; P = 0.004). These findings augment the existing evidence and underscore the transformative potential of stem cell therapy in cardiac treatment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.2025059978
Primary Topic
Mesenchymal stem cell research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
Mesenchymal stem cell research
article

The Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

article en

Abstract

A multitude of studies have investigated the identification of unique antigens and genetic traits associated with cardiac stem cells (CSCs) since their discovery. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac stem cells (CSCs), elucidate existing knowledge regarding their potential applications, and compare them with other novel therapeutic strategies for cardiac repair, including bone marrow cells (BMCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Researchers conducted a search of important indexing databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, and Embase, to identify pertinent papers published from 1980 to January 2025. A total of 74 studies involving 5,420 participants were selected from 459 evaluated for the study. A total of 2,931 participants were allocated to the intervention group, whereas 2,489 were assigned to the placebo or control groups. The research encompassed 49 papers on BMC therapy, 17 on MSC therapy, five on CSC therapy, and three on ADRC therapy. A 0.4% enhancement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.23-0.57; I2: 85%, P < 0.00001] was noted after stem cell therapy and in the stem cell therapy cohort, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) diminished by -0.33 mL (95% CI: -0.47 to -0.19; I2: 73%, P < 0.00001), whereas left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) reduced by -0.18 mL (95% CI: -0.31 to -0.05; I2: 68%, P = 0.006). Furthermore, in this cohort, the six-minute walk test (6MWT) exhibited an increase of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.06-0.34; I2: 0%, P = 0.005), whereas the standardized mean difference of infarct size (IS) demonstrated a reduction of -0.36% (95% CI: -0.60 to -0.12; I2: 68%; P = 0.004). These findings augment the existing evidence and underscore the transformative potential of stem cell therapy in cardiac treatment.

Critical Reviews in Biomedical EngineeringVol. 54(1)
Osh State University (KG), Atlas Üniversitesi, Istanbul Arel University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Mesenchymal stem cell research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.