Zur beanspruchten Eigenständigkeit Friedrich Nietzsches gegenüber Paul Rée. Ein Versuch

Abstract Before the study deals with the subject of Paul Rée’s possible influence on Friedrich Nietzsche, a biographical and work-historical sketch of Paul Rée is given, based primarily on archive material, which corrects a number of errors. The question of influence has two dimensions: one of content, and one of method, which Rée uses when he wants to turn moral philosophy into a science with the help of Charles Lyell’s book on geology. The study comes to the conclusion that Rée’s influence on Nietzsche is not insignificant, even if there are voices (Montinari, Gerhardt) that can certainly understand Nietzsche’s assertion that he was an independent thinker. Nietzsche’s treatise on the Genealogy of Morals , in which he decisively rejects Rée’s influence, is appreciated by Max Weber because of the concept of ressentiment used there, even if he is critical of it.

Publication Details

Journal
Nietzscheforschung
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/nifo-2025-006
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zur beanspruchten Eigenständigkeit Friedrich Nietzsches gegenüber Paul Rée. Ein Versuch

Nietzscheforschung
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

Zur beanspruchten Eigenständigkeit Friedrich Nietzsches gegenüber Paul Rée. Ein Versuch

article en

Abstract

Abstract Before the study deals with the subject of Paul Rée’s possible influence on Friedrich Nietzsche, a biographical and work-historical sketch of Paul Rée is given, based primarily on archive material, which corrects a number of errors. The question of influence has two dimensions: one of content, and one of method, which Rée uses when he wants to turn moral philosophy into a science with the help of Charles Lyell’s book on geology. The study comes to the conclusion that Rée’s influence on Nietzsche is not insignificant, even if there are voices (Montinari, Gerhardt) that can certainly understand Nietzsche’s assertion that he was an independent thinker. Nietzsche’s treatise on the Genealogy of Morals , in which he decisively rejects Rée’s influence, is appreciated by Max Weber because of the concept of ressentiment used there, even if he is critical of it.

NietzscheforschungVol. 32(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.