Validating the full and short versions of the aging-in-place instrument for native and migrant older adults in the Netherlands

The main premise of age-friendly environment development is to accommodate for the needs of diverse older-adult populations, which necessitates the availability of valid instruments that capture older adults' perceptions of their environments and reflect their aging-in-place needs. Most available instruments for age-friendliness measurement are homogeneous and not culturally adapted for use with diverse older-adult groups. This study was performed to validate an instrument measuring neighborhood age-friendliness and identifying aging-in-place needs for diverse older-adult populations. The target populations were older (aged ≥65 years) native-Dutch and first-generation migrant adults with Turkish, Surinamese, and Moroccan backgrounds residing in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Data were collected from 862 respondents (49 % response rate). The factor structure of the 37-item aging-in-place instrument was evaluated with the total sample. To reduce respondent burden, a shortened 24-item version was developed, and its model fit was tested with the four subgroups. The validity and reliability of the instrument were further examined. The 37-item aging-in-place instrument showed satisfactory to good model fit for the total sample. The shortened version also showed satisfactory to good fit for the four subgroups, and both versions had good internal consistency. For both versions, scores correlated negatively with the Brief Sense of Community Scale score, supporting their validity. With this study, we provide a valid, reliable, and culturally sensitive instrument that captures the perceptions of diverse older-adult populations regarding the age-friendliness of their environments and reflects their needs for aging in place. • Validates the Aging-in-Place Instrument for diverse older populations • Reflects needs of older adults to age in place across cultural backgrounds • Confirms reliability across four older adult subgroups in the Netherlands • Offers both full and short versions for flexible, context-sensitive use • Supports inclusive assessment of neighborhood age-friendliness

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106581
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating the full and short versions of the aging-in-place instrument for native and migrant older adults in the Netherlands

Cities
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Validating the full and short versions of the aging-in-place instrument for native and migrant older adults in the Netherlands

article en

Abstract

The main premise of age-friendly environment development is to accommodate for the needs of diverse older-adult populations, which necessitates the availability of valid instruments that capture older adults' perceptions of their environments and reflect their aging-in-place needs. Most available instruments for age-friendliness measurement are homogeneous and not culturally adapted for use with diverse older-adult groups. This study was performed to validate an instrument measuring neighborhood age-friendliness and identifying aging-in-place needs for diverse older-adult populations. The target populations were older (aged ≥65 years) native-Dutch and first-generation migrant adults with Turkish, Surinamese, and Moroccan backgrounds residing in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Data were collected from 862 respondents (49 % response rate). The factor structure of the 37-item aging-in-place instrument was evaluated with the total sample. To reduce respondent burden, a shortened 24-item version was developed, and its model fit was tested with the four subgroups. The validity and reliability of the instrument were further examined. The 37-item aging-in-place instrument showed satisfactory to good model fit for the total sample. The shortened version also showed satisfactory to good fit for the four subgroups, and both versions had good internal consistency. For both versions, scores correlated negatively with the Brief Sense of Community Scale score, supporting their validity. With this study, we provide a valid, reliable, and culturally sensitive instrument that captures the perceptions of diverse older-adult populations regarding the age-friendliness of their environments and reflects their needs for aging in place. • Validates the Aging-in-Place Instrument for diverse older populations • Reflects needs of older adults to age in place across cultural backgrounds • Confirms reliability across four older adult subgroups in the Netherlands • Offers both full and short versions for flexible, context-sensitive use • Supports inclusive assessment of neighborhood age-friendliness

CitiesVol. 170
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validating the full and short versions of the aging-in-place instrument for native and migrant older adults in the Netherlands · Cities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS