The justification of the loser-pays principle in civil litigation

In civil procedure, there are two main cost allocation rules: the English Rule and the American Rule. The English Rule, also known as the loser-pays principle, stipulates that the losing party must pay all legal expenses. The American Rule states that each party must pay their own attorney fees, regardless of the outcome of the proceedings. This paper critically reviews the primary theories supporting the loser-pays principle in civil litigation, including the theories of strict liability, compensation, procedural risk and policy, and the theory of the initiation of unnecessary costs. According to the teleological approach, which focuses on how litigation costs restrict the right to access to justice, the theory of initiation of unnecessary costs provides the most appropriate foundation for the loser-pays principle. This theory stems from the principle of economy of proceedings, which specifies effective legal protection by identifying the losing party as the party that caused unnecessary litigation costs, which are then logically imposed on that party.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universidade Portucalense
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(38)2025.ic-24
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The justification of the loser-pays principle in civil litigation

Universidade Portucalense
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

The justification of the loser-pays principle in civil litigation

article en

Abstract

In civil procedure, there are two main cost allocation rules: the English Rule and the American Rule. The English Rule, also known as the loser-pays principle, stipulates that the losing party must pay all legal expenses. The American Rule states that each party must pay their own attorney fees, regardless of the outcome of the proceedings. This paper critically reviews the primary theories supporting the loser-pays principle in civil litigation, including the theories of strict liability, compensation, procedural risk and policy, and the theory of the initiation of unnecessary costs. According to the teleological approach, which focuses on how litigation costs restrict the right to access to justice, the theory of initiation of unnecessary costs provides the most appropriate foundation for the loser-pays principle. This theory stems from the principle of economy of proceedings, which specifies effective legal protection by identifying the losing party as the party that caused unnecessary litigation costs, which are then logically imposed on that party.

Universidade Portucalense
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The justification of the loser-pays principle in civil litigation · Universidade Portucalense (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS