A Risk Assessment Method Using Neutrosophic PERT-FMEA

Classical failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used technique for conducting risk analysis and evaluation in safety engineering. Nonetheless, it faces challenges because of its assumption of equal importance for severity, occurrence, and detection as well as uncertainties stemming from expert judgment and limited system data. To address these issues, this study introduces an FMEA extension utilizing the neutrosophic program evaluation and review technique (NPERT) approach. Furthermore, the significance weights of the risk parameters were established using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, which is based on single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNS) and triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs). This method was hypothetically applied to a centrally controlled natural-gas heating system. Compared to the traditional FMEA, the proposed method produced more precise results and improved performance, facilitating better decision-making under uncertain conditions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17530803
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Risk Assessment Method Using Neutrosophic PERT-FMEA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Risk Assessment Method Using Neutrosophic PERT-FMEA

article en

Abstract

Classical failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a widely used technique for conducting risk analysis and evaluation in safety engineering. Nonetheless, it faces challenges because of its assumption of equal importance for severity, occurrence, and detection as well as uncertainties stemming from expert judgment and limited system data. To address these issues, this study introduces an FMEA extension utilizing the neutrosophic program evaluation and review technique (NPERT) approach. Furthermore, the significance weights of the risk parameters were established using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, which is based on single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNS) and triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs). This method was hypothetically applied to a centrally controlled natural-gas heating system. Compared to the traditional FMEA, the proposed method produced more precise results and improved performance, facilitating better decision-making under uncertain conditions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Health Science (KH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Risk Assessment Method Using Neutrosophic PERT-FMEA · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS