Optimizing 3D Container Loading in Maritime Logistics: Classical A3C vs Quantum-Augmented QA3C

This study compares the classical asynchronous advantage actor-critic (A3C) algorithm with a quantum-assisted variant (QA3C) for three-dimensional loading of 20-ft containers in maritime logistics. Simulations used sets of 300, 350, and 400 boxes of varying sizes, and both agents were trained under four qubit configurations (0, 5, 10, and 15). Each configuration was evaluated over fifty trials, recording fill rate, skip rate, and training time. On average, QA3C improved the fill rate by 5.70 percentage points, peaking at 72.40% for 400 boxes with ten qubits. It also produced more uniform, layered stacks that reduced unused volume. Gains remained consistent across box counts, demonstrating QA3C's robustness under varying load sizes. Overall skip rate fell by about 3.00 percentage points and success rate reached 65.70% in the 300-box scenario. A3C training converged in around 1.40 s, whereas QA3C required between 6.60 and 21.50 s as qubit count rose. These findings indicate that adding parametrized quantum circuits to reinforcement learning can boost packing efficiency and produce more stable placement outcomes without extra training time. Such benefits could help optimize container space use by reducing unused volume and improving placement consistency across different box counts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17530820
Primary Topic
Optimization and Packing Problems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing 3D Container Loading in Maritime Logistics: Classical A3C vs Quantum-Augmented QA3C

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Optimization and Packing Problems
article

Optimizing 3D Container Loading in Maritime Logistics: Classical A3C vs Quantum-Augmented QA3C

article en

Abstract

This study compares the classical asynchronous advantage actor-critic (A3C) algorithm with a quantum-assisted variant (QA3C) for three-dimensional loading of 20-ft containers in maritime logistics. Simulations used sets of 300, 350, and 400 boxes of varying sizes, and both agents were trained under four qubit configurations (0, 5, 10, and 15). Each configuration was evaluated over fifty trials, recording fill rate, skip rate, and training time. On average, QA3C improved the fill rate by 5.70 percentage points, peaking at 72.40% for 400 boxes with ten qubits. It also produced more uniform, layered stacks that reduced unused volume. Gains remained consistent across box counts, demonstrating QA3C's robustness under varying load sizes. Overall skip rate fell by about 3.00 percentage points and success rate reached 65.70% in the 300-box scenario. A3C training converged in around 1.40 s, whereas QA3C required between 6.60 and 21.50 s as qubit count rose. These findings indicate that adding parametrized quantum circuits to reinforcement learning can boost packing efficiency and produce more stable placement outcomes without extra training time. Such benefits could help optimize container space use by reducing unused volume and improving placement consistency across different box counts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sakarya University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Optimization and Packing Problems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing 3D Container Loading in Maritime Logistics: Classical A3C vs Quantum-Augmented QA3C · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS