VALIDATION OF THE EBJIS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEBRIDEMENT, ANTIBIOTICS, AND IMPLANT RETENTION (DAIR) AS A CURATIVE PROCEDURE IN THE HIP AND KNEE

Aim To investigate the validity of the recommendations from the 2025 EBJIS position paper 1 on DAIR and the relationship to clinical outcome. Method Patients undergoing DAIR for EBJIS criteria confirmed PJI of the hip or knee were classified using the EBJIS recommendations into ‘good indications for DAIR’, ‘higher risk’ or ‘DAIR contraindicated’. The quality of the surgery performed was also determined as ‘Full DAIR’, including good debridement and exchange of mobile parts or ‘Suboptimal’, without exchange or simple washout. The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined as reoperation for infection, continued antibiotic suppression, amputation, or death from PJI, after index surgery. Results 305 eligible patients (132 hips, 173 knees) were included from six UK centres, with a mean follow-up of 47.4 months (minimum 8 months). 88 had good indications, 72 had higher risk factors and 145 contraindications to DAIR. Full DAIR was performed in 195 cases (63.9%). Overall clinical failure rate was 45.9%. With all surgery, good indication patients had a significantly better outcome compared to higher risk or contraindicated cases (30.7% failure vs 33.3% and 61.4%; p=0.013). When a full DAIR was performed, patients with good indications, including with higher risks, had half the failure rate of those with contraindications (26/96, 27.1% vs 89/145, 56.6%; p<0.0001). The ideal situation (full DAIR in good indication patients) had a failure rate of 23.4% compared to 71.7% in contraindicated patients with suboptimal surgery (p<0.003). Suboptimal surgery increased the failure rate in all groups. Conclusions This large study confirms that the EBJIS recommendations for DAIR are valid and accurately predict the clinical outcome after surgery. Failure to perform a full DAIR was common (36.1%). Surgeons often chose DAIR in patients with definite contraindications (47.5%). Outcome from DAIR surgery could be greatly improved with implementation of the EBJIS recommendations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.12.093
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VALIDATION OF THE EBJIS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEBRIDEMENT, ANTIBIOTICS, AND IMPLANT RETENTION (DAIR) AS A CURATIVE PROCEDURE IN THE HIP AND KNEE

Orthopaedic Proceedings
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

VALIDATION OF THE EBJIS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEBRIDEMENT, ANTIBIOTICS, AND IMPLANT RETENTION (DAIR) AS A CURATIVE PROCEDURE IN THE HIP AND KNEE

article en

Abstract

Aim To investigate the validity of the recommendations from the 2025 EBJIS position paper 1 on DAIR and the relationship to clinical outcome. Method Patients undergoing DAIR for EBJIS criteria confirmed PJI of the hip or knee were classified using the EBJIS recommendations into ‘good indications for DAIR’, ‘higher risk’ or ‘DAIR contraindicated’. The quality of the surgery performed was also determined as ‘Full DAIR’, including good debridement and exchange of mobile parts or ‘Suboptimal’, without exchange or simple washout. The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined as reoperation for infection, continued antibiotic suppression, amputation, or death from PJI, after index surgery. Results 305 eligible patients (132 hips, 173 knees) were included from six UK centres, with a mean follow-up of 47.4 months (minimum 8 months). 88 had good indications, 72 had higher risk factors and 145 contraindications to DAIR. Full DAIR was performed in 195 cases (63.9%). Overall clinical failure rate was 45.9%. With all surgery, good indication patients had a significantly better outcome compared to higher risk or contraindicated cases (30.7% failure vs 33.3% and 61.4%; p=0.013). When a full DAIR was performed, patients with good indications, including with higher risks, had half the failure rate of those with contraindications (26/96, 27.1% vs 89/145, 56.6%; p<0.0001). The ideal situation (full DAIR in good indication patients) had a failure rate of 23.4% compared to 71.7% in contraindicated patients with suboptimal surgery (p<0.003). Suboptimal surgery increased the failure rate in all groups. Conclusions This large study confirms that the EBJIS recommendations for DAIR are valid and accurately predict the clinical outcome after surgery. Failure to perform a full DAIR was common (36.1%). Surgeons often chose DAIR in patients with definite contraindications (47.5%). Outcome from DAIR surgery could be greatly improved with implementation of the EBJIS recommendations.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_12)
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), Stoke Mandeville Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.