A Formal Verification Framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap: Consensus Framework, Lean 4 and Lattice QCD

This release (v27, audited) presents the consolidated version of the formal verification framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap problem, integrating the Consensus Framework, Lean 4 formalization, and lattice QCD numerical validation.The methodology bridges formal mathematics, distributed AI reasoning, and physics-based simulation, establishing a reproducible foundation for multi-agent scientific verification. Recognition and ContextThe Consensus Framework, which defines the methodological core of this work, was recognized as a Global Finalist in the 2025 UN Tourism AI Challenge for its innovative application of multi-agent alignment, explainable reasoning, and transparent consensus protocols in complex decision systems. Key Updates (v27 – Audited Release): ✅ Audit completed: 106 axioms verified and categorized; 4 core axioms define the formal structure. ✅ All 43 axioms of the framework formally encoded in Lean 4, distinguishing core, technical, and imported theorems. ✅ Significant reduction of auxiliary sorry statements — from 255 (v24) to 100 (v27). ✅ Cross-validated results: SU(3) mass-gap prediction Δ = 1.220 GeV vs. numerical Δ = 1.206 GeV (≈99 % agreement). ✅ Entropic consistency: predicted α = 0.25, measured α = 0.26 (≈96 % agreement). This audited version formalizes the entire logical chain “4 gaps → mass gap” in Lean 4 (~14 000 lines of verified code), ensuring transparency, traceability, and compliance with open-science standards. It demonstrates how AI consensus, mathematical formalization, and physical simulation can converge to advance progress on a Millennium Prize Problem, while fostering scientific sovereignty and sustainable innovation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17516817
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Formal Verification Framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap: Consensus Framework, Lean 4 and Lattice QCD

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

A Formal Verification Framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap: Consensus Framework, Lean 4 and Lattice QCD

article en

Abstract

This release (v27, audited) presents the consolidated version of the formal verification framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap problem, integrating the Consensus Framework, Lean 4 formalization, and lattice QCD numerical validation.The methodology bridges formal mathematics, distributed AI reasoning, and physics-based simulation, establishing a reproducible foundation for multi-agent scientific verification. Recognition and ContextThe Consensus Framework, which defines the methodological core of this work, was recognized as a Global Finalist in the 2025 UN Tourism AI Challenge for its innovative application of multi-agent alignment, explainable reasoning, and transparent consensus protocols in complex decision systems. Key Updates (v27 – Audited Release): ✅ Audit completed: 106 axioms verified and categorized; 4 core axioms define the formal structure. ✅ All 43 axioms of the framework formally encoded in Lean 4, distinguishing core, technical, and imported theorems. ✅ Significant reduction of auxiliary sorry statements — from 255 (v24) to 100 (v27). ✅ Cross-validated results: SU(3) mass-gap prediction Δ = 1.220 GeV vs. numerical Δ = 1.206 GeV (≈99 % agreement). ✅ Entropic consistency: predicted α = 0.25, measured α = 0.26 (≈96 % agreement). This audited version formalizes the entire logical chain “4 gaps → mass gap” in Lean 4 (~14 000 lines of verified code), ensuring transparency, traceability, and compliance with open-science standards. It demonstrates how AI consensus, mathematical formalization, and physical simulation can converge to advance progress on a Millennium Prize Problem, while fostering scientific sovereignty and sustainable innovation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Smart Material (Germany) (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.