A Formal Verification Framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap: Consensus Framework, Lean 4 and Lattice QCD
This release (v27, audited) presents the consolidated version of the formal verification framework for the Yang–Mills Mass Gap problem, integrating the Consensus Framework, Lean 4 formalization, and lattice QCD numerical validation.The methodology bridges formal mathematics, distributed AI reasoning, and physics-based simulation, establishing a reproducible foundation for multi-agent scientific verification. Recognition and ContextThe Consensus Framework, which defines the methodological core of this work, was recognized as a Global Finalist in the 2025 UN Tourism AI Challenge for its innovative application of multi-agent alignment, explainable reasoning, and transparent consensus protocols in complex decision systems. Key Updates (v27 – Audited Release): ✅ Audit completed: 106 axioms verified and categorized; 4 core axioms define the formal structure. ✅ All 43 axioms of the framework formally encoded in Lean 4, distinguishing core, technical, and imported theorems. ✅ Significant reduction of auxiliary sorry statements — from 255 (v24) to 100 (v27). ✅ Cross-validated results: SU(3) mass-gap prediction Δ = 1.220 GeV vs. numerical Δ = 1.206 GeV (≈99 % agreement). ✅ Entropic consistency: predicted α = 0.25, measured α = 0.26 (≈96 % agreement). This audited version formalizes the entire logical chain “4 gaps → mass gap” in Lean 4 (~14 000 lines of verified code), ensuring transparency, traceability, and compliance with open-science standards. It demonstrates how AI consensus, mathematical formalization, and physical simulation can converge to advance progress on a Millennium Prize Problem, while fostering scientific sovereignty and sustainable innovation.
Institutions
- Smart Material (Germany) (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-10-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17516817
- Primary Topic
- Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00