Modes of Recognition and the Persistence of Center-Periphery Constellations in the Digital Public Sphere

The digital public sphere is characterized by seemingly paradoxical tensions between centers and peripheries: While some actors leverage the affordances of digital platforms to garner attention and gain prominence in public discourse, others prefer to seek out a role of relative obscurity or even attempt to evade observation. These tensions challenge established public sphere theories that assume a uniform orientation and attraction toward a center. In this article, we argue that in the digital public sphere, four distinct modes of recognition emerge: attention, resonance, allegiance, and engagement. These modes induce persistent yet contingent center-periphery distinctions among actors, issues, and even entire arenas. Since modes of recognition can carry positive or negative valence, they can prompt a purposive orientation toward peripheries rather than centers. We discuss how digital platforms afford, manifest, and manipulate modes of recognition and how actors leverage positions of relative centrality or peripherality within and across digital arenas.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modes of Recognition and the Persistence of Center-Periphery Constellations in the Digital Public Sphere

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Social Media and Politics
article

Modes of Recognition and the Persistence of Center-Periphery Constellations in the Digital Public Sphere

article en

Abstract

The digital public sphere is characterized by seemingly paradoxical tensions between centers and peripheries: While some actors leverage the affordances of digital platforms to garner attention and gain prominence in public discourse, others prefer to seek out a role of relative obscurity or even attempt to evade observation. These tensions challenge established public sphere theories that assume a uniform orientation and attraction toward a center. In this article, we argue that in the digital public sphere, four distinct modes of recognition emerge: attention, resonance, allegiance, and engagement. These modes induce persistent yet contingent center-periphery distinctions among actors, issues, and even entire arenas. Since modes of recognition can carry positive or negative valence, they can prompt a purposive orientation toward peripheries rather than centers. We discuss how digital platforms afford, manifest, and manipulate modes of recognition and how actors leverage positions of relative centrality or peripherality within and across digital arenas.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modes of Recognition and the Persistence of Center-Periphery Constellations in the Digital Public Sphere · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS