Media Technologies and Epistemologies: The Platforming of Everything| What Prompts Suspicions About Information Integrity? Motives for Fact-Checking Suspect Content

The rise of misinformation in digital news flows has led to a corresponding call for more investigation into the antecedents of news verification—and for improved understanding about who verifies and why. In this study, we conduct a thematic analysis of participants’ open-ended responses (N = 2,345 individual thoughts, volunteered by N = 715 participants) to an online survey prompt to explore epistemological influences on user decisions to verify or not verify information they have reason to believe might be false, when given the opportunity to do so. The analysis identifies 8 themes associated with information verification from user responses and then examines how these epistemological motives vary when examined across individual differences that previous research suggests may be impactful. Specifically, we examine the association of themes with procedural news knowledge, news skepticism, and individual motivations for media use (surveillance vs. entertainment). Results show significant differences in the characteristics of searchers compared with non-searchers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-09-01
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Media Technologies and Epistemologies: The Platforming of Everything| What Prompts Suspicions About Information Integrity? Motives for Fact-Checking Suspect Content

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Media Technologies and Epistemologies: The Platforming of Everything| What Prompts Suspicions About Information Integrity? Motives for Fact-Checking Suspect Content

article en

Abstract

The rise of misinformation in digital news flows has led to a corresponding call for more investigation into the antecedents of news verification—and for improved understanding about who verifies and why. In this study, we conduct a thematic analysis of participants’ open-ended responses (N = 2,345 individual thoughts, volunteered by N = 715 participants) to an online survey prompt to explore epistemological influences on user decisions to verify or not verify information they have reason to believe might be false, when given the opportunity to do so. The analysis identifies 8 themes associated with information verification from user responses and then examines how these epistemological motives vary when examined across individual differences that previous research suggests may be impactful. Specifically, we examine the association of themes with procedural news knowledge, news skepticism, and individual motivations for media use (surveillance vs. entertainment). Results show significant differences in the characteristics of searchers compared with non-searchers.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Texas Tech University (US), Colorado Technical University
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Media Technologies and Epistemologies: The Platforming of Everything| What Prompts Suspicions About Information Integrity? Motives for Fact-Checking Suspect Content · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS