Transparency and Judicial Review: An Empirical Study of the Duty of Candour

In England and Wales, all parties to judicial review proceedings are under a general duty of candour, requiring them to provide a full and accurate account of all the facts and information relevant to the issue under review. However, the duty is under strain from a variety of pressures, including changing litigation practices, the use of digital technology and remote working in government decision-making, and the rising use of complex decisionmaking systems in public administration. Further, as outlined by submissions to the Independent Review of Administrative Law panel, there is uncertainty in legal doctrine and amongst practitioners over the parameters of the duty. Though the duty of candour is central to the operation of public law litigation, it has received surprisingly little scholarly study. This report responds to this evidence gap. It outlines the findings from a detailed study capturing how the duty of candour is operating in practice.

Publication Details

Journal
Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Published
2024-10-07
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparency and Judicial Review: An Empirical Study of the Duty of Candour

Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Transparency and Judicial Review: An Empirical Study of the Duty of Candour

article en

Abstract

In England and Wales, all parties to judicial review proceedings are under a general duty of candour, requiring them to provide a full and accurate account of all the facts and information relevant to the issue under review. However, the duty is under strain from a variety of pressures, including changing litigation practices, the use of digital technology and remote working in government decision-making, and the rising use of complex decisionmaking systems in public administration. Further, as outlined by submissions to the Independent Review of Administrative Law panel, there is uncertainty in legal doctrine and amongst practitioners over the parameters of the duty. Though the duty of candour is central to the operation of public law litigation, it has received surprisingly little scholarly study. This report responds to this evidence gap. It outlines the findings from a detailed study capturing how the duty of candour is operating in practice.

Durham Research Online (Durham University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.