Comparative Analysis of Tumor Mutational Burden and Copy Number Alterations in WHO-Graded Meningiomas

Background: Meningiomas represent the most common primary intracranial tumor, yet molecular predictors of clinical aggressiveness remain poorly characterized. We conducted a comprehensive multi-omics analysis to investigate whether tumor mutational burden (TMB) and copy number alterations (CNA) correlate with WHO grade classification. Methods: We obtained multi-omics data from 121 meningioma patients (95.0% with somatic mutations, n=115; 100% with copy number data, n=121; 79.3% with protein abundance data, n=96) from the University of Toronto cBioPortal study. Supplementary data included 2 TCGA meningioma samples with whole exome sequencing and 51 meningiomas from Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (GSE43290, n=47; GSE88720, n=14). Clinical annotations included WHO grade (Grade I: n=59; Grade II: n=43; Grade III: n=19; missing: n=2) and recurrence status. Statistical comparisons used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with significance threshold p<0.05. Machine learning classification was performed using logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models on 114 samples with complete genomic data. Results: High-grade meningiomas (WHO Grade II/III, n=62) demonstrated significantly elevated TMB compared to Grade I tumors (n=56): mean 0.450 vs. 0.222 mutations/Mb (fold- change 2.03×, p=1.28×10⁻⁴). Similarly, CNA burden was substantially higher in high-grade tumors: mean fraction genome altered 0.166 vs. 0.098 (fold-change 1.70×, p=1.10×10⁻⁴). Logistic regression achieved the highest classification performance with AUC=0.879 and 76.5% accuracy on the test set (n=34), significantly exceeding the discrimination threshold of AUC>0.70. Conclusion: Genomic variant burden effectively stratifies meningioma aggressiveness and demonstrates clinical utility for grade prediction. These findings support TMB and CNA as quantitative biomarkers for identifying high-risk meningiomas and may guide surveillance protocols and treatment decisions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17493906
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Tumor Mutational Burden and Copy Number Alterations in WHO-Graded Meningiomas

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Meningioma and schwannoma management
article

Comparative Analysis of Tumor Mutational Burden and Copy Number Alterations in WHO-Graded Meningiomas

article en

Abstract

Background: Meningiomas represent the most common primary intracranial tumor, yet molecular predictors of clinical aggressiveness remain poorly characterized. We conducted a comprehensive multi-omics analysis to investigate whether tumor mutational burden (TMB) and copy number alterations (CNA) correlate with WHO grade classification. Methods: We obtained multi-omics data from 121 meningioma patients (95.0% with somatic mutations, n=115; 100% with copy number data, n=121; 79.3% with protein abundance data, n=96) from the University of Toronto cBioPortal study. Supplementary data included 2 TCGA meningioma samples with whole exome sequencing and 51 meningiomas from Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (GSE43290, n=47; GSE88720, n=14). Clinical annotations included WHO grade (Grade I: n=59; Grade II: n=43; Grade III: n=19; missing: n=2) and recurrence status. Statistical comparisons used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with significance threshold p<0.05. Machine learning classification was performed using logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models on 114 samples with complete genomic data. Results: High-grade meningiomas (WHO Grade II/III, n=62) demonstrated significantly elevated TMB compared to Grade I tumors (n=56): mean 0.450 vs. 0.222 mutations/Mb (fold- change 2.03×, p=1.28×10⁻⁴). Similarly, CNA burden was substantially higher in high-grade tumors: mean fraction genome altered 0.166 vs. 0.098 (fold-change 1.70×, p=1.10×10⁻⁴). Logistic regression achieved the highest classification performance with AUC=0.879 and 76.5% accuracy on the test set (n=34), significantly exceeding the discrimination threshold of AUC>0.70. Conclusion: Genomic variant burden effectively stratifies meningioma aggressiveness and demonstrates clinical utility for grade prediction. These findings support TMB and CNA as quantitative biomarkers for identifying high-risk meningiomas and may guide surveillance protocols and treatment decisions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Nigeria (NG), Dr. Hari Singh Gour University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Tumor Mutational Burden and Copy Number Alterations in WHO-Graded Meningiomas · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS