NAPSEA Report on the stakeholder workshop and the workshop participants feedback on the methodology

During a so-called summer workshop held in Nijmegen, Netherlands, in June 2025, some project results of the NAPSEA project were presented and collectively discussed. This deliverable presents the feedback provided by participants on a methodology for analysing policy instruments to reduce nutrients from agricultural activities (see D2.1; Geidel et al., 2023), along with the recommendations based on the analysis (see D2.3; Dworak et al., 2025). While there was very little feedback on the methodology, the discussion centred on the policy recommendations under D2.3. Participants raised concerns about the limited integration of marine targets into river basin management plans, noting that while some targets exist, they are often voluntary and lack binding measures. They suggested better coordinating WFD and MSFD thresholds. Inconsistencies across policies and thresholds were highlighted as confusing and counterproductive, particularly for farmers who face conflicting requirements and trade-offs in implementing measures. Farmers’ perspectives were emphasised, with calls for more transparent communication, dedicated engagement sessions, and the sharing of peer-based best practices supported by science to build trust and support long-term planning. Broader governance challenges were identified, including fragmented policies, weak coordination between marine and freshwater management, and legal risks if inconsistencies persist; participants urged stronger collaboration, more coherent reporting, and critical input into the EU Zero Pollution Plan. Finally, participants emphasised the importance of effective communication and continuity, noting that eutrophication is challenging to visualise and that trust relies on clear guidance, consistent contact points, and improved integration of policies across levels.