Central Bank Communication, Financial Frictions and Investment Decisions

I study the role of financial positions in the transmission of Fed information to investment. Central bank communication influence firms’ expectations and stimulate investment, but its aggregate impact hinges on firms’ financial positions. In the data, low-leverage firms invest nearly twice as much as high-leverage firms following Fed information shocks, consistent with easier access to credit markets and borrowing. To assess the aggregate implications, I augment a heterogeneous-firm model with financial frictions and default risk to include a role for Fed information. The model shows that Fed information amplifies aggregate investment volatility by around 10 percent, but its effectiveness is dampened by leverage heterogeneity, which reduces the aggregate response by about 20 percent. Moreover, while Fed communication is most powerful in recessions, its aggregate impact is dampened when credit conditions are tight. These results suggest that forward guidance is most effective when complemented by credit policy.

Publication Details

Journal
Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13016/m2tpni-hjtr
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Central Bank Communication, Financial Frictions and Investment Decisions

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Central Bank Communication, Financial Frictions and Investment Decisions

article en

Abstract

I study the role of financial positions in the transmission of Fed information to investment. Central bank communication influence firms’ expectations and stimulate investment, but its aggregate impact hinges on firms’ financial positions. In the data, low-leverage firms invest nearly twice as much as high-leverage firms following Fed information shocks, consistent with easier access to credit markets and borrowing. To assess the aggregate implications, I augment a heterogeneous-firm model with financial frictions and default risk to include a role for Fed information. The model shows that Fed information amplifies aggregate investment volatility by around 10 percent, but its effectiveness is dampened by leverage heterogeneity, which reduces the aggregate response by about 20 percent. Moreover, while Fed communication is most powerful in recessions, its aggregate impact is dampened when credit conditions are tight. These results suggest that forward guidance is most effective when complemented by credit policy.

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.