Lexicon for a Capitalist Image

This article examines the intricate relationship between capitalism, its visual representation, and its logic of appearance. It addresses the paradox of how capitalist production, rooted in the exploitation of labor, is transformed in the sphere of circulation into a system of equivalences that conceals social contradictions. Central to this discussion is the dual role of the image, which both reveals and obscures capitalism's inherent antagonisms. The authors revisit Sergei Eisenstein's unrealized attempt to visually adapt Marx's Capital, in which montage was envisioned as a tool to unravel the complexities of capitalist dynamics. They also reference contemporary works, such as Jia Zhang-ke's Touch of Sin, which dialectically negotiate the universality of capitalist exploitation through localized narratives. Additionally, the essay explores key theoretical concepts, including commodity fetishism, abstract labor, and fictitious capital, arguing that cinema's capacity to expose, mediate, and recontextualize the concrete transforms our perception and understanding of these phenomena. By analyzing cinema's engagement with appearance and its role in addressing capitalism's representational challenges, the authors highlight the critical importance of visual and film studies in providing a unique perspective to interrogate and confront the complexities of capitalism's elusive mode of appearance.

Publication Details

Journal
South Atlantic Quarterly
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-11963136
Primary Topic
Cinema and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lexicon for a Capitalist Image

South Atlantic Quarterly
Cinema and Media Studies
article

Lexicon for a Capitalist Image

article en

Abstract

This article examines the intricate relationship between capitalism, its visual representation, and its logic of appearance. It addresses the paradox of how capitalist production, rooted in the exploitation of labor, is transformed in the sphere of circulation into a system of equivalences that conceals social contradictions. Central to this discussion is the dual role of the image, which both reveals and obscures capitalism's inherent antagonisms. The authors revisit Sergei Eisenstein's unrealized attempt to visually adapt Marx's Capital, in which montage was envisioned as a tool to unravel the complexities of capitalist dynamics. They also reference contemporary works, such as Jia Zhang-ke's Touch of Sin, which dialectically negotiate the universality of capitalist exploitation through localized narratives. Additionally, the essay explores key theoretical concepts, including commodity fetishism, abstract labor, and fictitious capital, arguing that cinema's capacity to expose, mediate, and recontextualize the concrete transforms our perception and understanding of these phenomena. By analyzing cinema's engagement with appearance and its role in addressing capitalism's representational challenges, the authors highlight the critical importance of visual and film studies in providing a unique perspective to interrogate and confront the complexities of capitalism's elusive mode of appearance.

South Atlantic QuarterlyVol. 124(4)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cinema and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.