Assessing the efficacy, safety and utility of hybrid closed-loop glucose control compared with standard insulin therapy combined with continuous glucose monitoring in young people (≥16 years) and adults with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CL4P-CF

Introduction Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is one of the most clinically impactful comorbidities associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). Current recommended management with insulin therapy is challenging due to variable daily insulin requirements and adds to the significant burden of self-management. This study aims to determine if hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery can improve glucose outcomes compared with standard insulin therapy with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in young people (≥16 years) and adults with CFRD. Methods and analysis This open-label, multicentre, randomised, two-arm, single-period parallel design study aims to randomise 114 young people (≥16 years) and adults with CFRD. Following a 2–3 weeks’ run-in period, during which time participants use a masked CGM, participants with time in target glucose range (3.9–10.0 mmol/L) <80% will be randomised to 26 weeks with hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery or standard insulin therapy with CGM. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in time in target glucose range (3.9–10.0 mmol/L) based on CGM levels during the 26-week study phase. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Key secondary outcomes are time above target glucose range (>10.0 mmol/L), mean glucose and HbA1c. Other secondary efficacy outcomes include glucose and insulin metrics, change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and body mass index. Safety, utility, participant experiences and participant-reported outcome measures will also be evaluated. The trial is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been obtained from East of England–Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and findings will be shared with people living with CF, healthcare providers and relevant stakeholders. Trial registration number NCT05562492 .

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111408
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the efficacy, safety and utility of hybrid closed-loop glucose control compared with standard insulin therapy combined with continuous glucose monitoring in young people (≥16 years) and adults with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CL4P-CF

BMJ Open
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
article

Assessing the efficacy, safety and utility of hybrid closed-loop glucose control compared with standard insulin therapy combined with continuous glucose monitoring in young people (≥16 years) and adults with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CL4P-CF

article en

Abstract

Introduction Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is one of the most clinically impactful comorbidities associated with cystic fibrosis (CF). Current recommended management with insulin therapy is challenging due to variable daily insulin requirements and adds to the significant burden of self-management. This study aims to determine if hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery can improve glucose outcomes compared with standard insulin therapy with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in young people (≥16 years) and adults with CFRD. Methods and analysis This open-label, multicentre, randomised, two-arm, single-period parallel design study aims to randomise 114 young people (≥16 years) and adults with CFRD. Following a 2–3 weeks’ run-in period, during which time participants use a masked CGM, participants with time in target glucose range (3.9–10.0 mmol/L) <80% will be randomised to 26 weeks with hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery or standard insulin therapy with CGM. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in time in target glucose range (3.9–10.0 mmol/L) based on CGM levels during the 26-week study phase. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Key secondary outcomes are time above target glucose range (>10.0 mmol/L), mean glucose and HbA1c. Other secondary efficacy outcomes include glucose and insulin metrics, change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and body mass index. Safety, utility, participant experiences and participant-reported outcome measures will also be evaluated. The trial is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been obtained from East of England–Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, and findings will be shared with people living with CF, healthcare providers and relevant stakeholders. Trial registration number NCT05562492 .

BMJ OpenVol. 15(10)
St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Royal Papworth Hospital (GB), Glenfield Hospital (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Bristol Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Brompton Hospital (GB), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Wellcome/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science (GB), University Hospital Llandough (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Glasgow Centre for Population Health (GB), Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Dexcom, National Institute for Health and Care Research, University of Oxford, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.