Relative Bioavailability of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol – is Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling a Relevant Alternative to a Non-Compartmental Approach?

Johan Rosenborg,1 Per Bäckman,2 Thomas Bengtsson,1 Scott Haughie3 1StatMind AB, Lund, Sweden; 2Emmace Consulting AB, Lund, Sweden; 3Viatris, Mylan Pharma UK Ltd, Sandwich, UKCorrespondence: Johan Rosenborg, Email [email protected] Per Bäckman, Email [email protected]: Conventional statistical analysis of clinical data based on standard methods suggests that fixed combinations of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (SALM) inhaled via Wixela® Inhub® dry powder (test) are therapeutically and pharmacokinetically equivalent to Advair® Diskus® (reference). Assessment of bioequivalence, test/reference, based on empirical population pharmacokinetic modelling was compared with published outcomes based on a non-compartmental analysis (NCA) approach.Methods: Three inhalations of FP/SALM were administered to healthy subjects with 7-day washouts via test and reference and delivered doses of 100/50, 250/50, or 500/50 μg (total matched doses of 300/150, 750/150, or 1500/150 μg) in studies 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Empirically derived pharmacokinetic structural models, considering random effects of subject (FP, SALM) or study (SALM), emulating linear first-order input, disposition and elimination were fitted to plasma concentrations with a frequentist approach, by study/dose of FP, and across studies of SALM, using product as categorical covariate. Bioequivalence was assessed using individually predicted relative systemic extent of bioavailability (F4_rel) and ratio of individually predicted peak concentrations (Cmax).Results: The models adequately described plasma concentration versus time data. Descriptive statistics and bioequivalence assessments (90% confidence interval generally within 0.80– 1.25) reflected NCA-derived outcomes.Conclusion: Model- and NCA-based approaches to assess bioequivalence were consistent. However, a frequentist parametric approach that fully utilizes the population analysis potential and mechanistically predicts regional pulmonary deposition of FP and SALM would require a demographically more heterogenous data set and analysis including additional outcomes of parenteral and oral administration to discriminate presystemic from systemic disposition.Keywords: fluticasone propionate, salmeterol, inhalation, pharmacokinetics

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative Bioavailability of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol – is Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling a Relevant Alternative to a Non-Compartmental Approach?

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
article

Relative Bioavailability of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol – is Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling a Relevant Alternative to a Non-Compartmental Approach?

article en

Abstract

Johan Rosenborg,1 Per Bäckman,2 Thomas Bengtsson,1 Scott Haughie3 1StatMind AB, Lund, Sweden; 2Emmace Consulting AB, Lund, Sweden; 3Viatris, Mylan Pharma UK Ltd, Sandwich, UKCorrespondence: Johan Rosenborg, Email [email protected] Per Bäckman, Email [email protected]: Conventional statistical analysis of clinical data based on standard methods suggests that fixed combinations of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (SALM) inhaled via Wixela® Inhub® dry powder (test) are therapeutically and pharmacokinetically equivalent to Advair® Diskus® (reference). Assessment of bioequivalence, test/reference, based on empirical population pharmacokinetic modelling was compared with published outcomes based on a non-compartmental analysis (NCA) approach.Methods: Three inhalations of FP/SALM were administered to healthy subjects with 7-day washouts via test and reference and delivered doses of 100/50, 250/50, or 500/50 μg (total matched doses of 300/150, 750/150, or 1500/150 μg) in studies 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Empirically derived pharmacokinetic structural models, considering random effects of subject (FP, SALM) or study (SALM), emulating linear first-order input, disposition and elimination were fitted to plasma concentrations with a frequentist approach, by study/dose of FP, and across studies of SALM, using product as categorical covariate. Bioequivalence was assessed using individually predicted relative systemic extent of bioavailability (F4_rel) and ratio of individually predicted peak concentrations (Cmax).Results: The models adequately described plasma concentration versus time data. Descriptive statistics and bioequivalence assessments (90% confidence interval generally within 0.80– 1.25) reflected NCA-derived outcomes.Conclusion: Model- and NCA-based approaches to assess bioequivalence were consistent. However, a frequentist parametric approach that fully utilizes the population analysis potential and mechanistically predicts regional pulmonary deposition of FP and SALM would require a demographically more heterogenous data set and analysis including additional outcomes of parenteral and oral administration to discriminate presystemic from systemic disposition.Keywords: fluticasone propionate, salmeterol, inhalation, pharmacokinetics

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Pharmacological Effects and Assays
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relative Bioavailability of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol – is Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling a Relevant Alternative to a Non-Compartmental Approach? · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS