Implications of biological activated carbon (BAC) filters for pharmaceutical removal from municipal wastewater: A review on its properties, operational factors, and biofilms

Conventional domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are not currently designed to completely remove organic micro-pollutants (OMPs), specifically pharmaceutical residues, from the water. Biological activated carbon (BAC) filters are applied as a treatment to further remove the residues. This study consists of a systematic review ( n = 158) and cross-study comparison ( n = 17) from studies published between 2011 and 2025, evaluates the performance of BAC filters for treating secondary WWTP effluent, quantifies the roles of different operational parameters to achieve a higher pharmaceutical removal, and identifies research gaps in understanding BAC filter performance. In total, 77 BAC filter performance data sets were extracted from studies. An increase in EBCT showed significance in removing diclofenac but not for atenolol, carbamazepine, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). A higher removal of atenolol, carbamazepine, and diclofenac was observed with advanced oxygen oxidation processes (AOPs) pre-treatment to BAC filters, such as ozonation. Other operational parameters, such as physico-chemical characteristics of carbon, aeration, and backwash practice, are also discussed in this review. Future research that could be impactful in BAC filter optimization includes the assessment of microbial activity and its characterization, the role of biofilm, and the effects of influent compositions on the removal of pharmaceutical removal. • Review and cross-study comparison reveal BAC filter performance for WWTP effluent. • Biofilms on GAC support long-term operation of BAC filters. • EBCT improved diclofenac removal, not atenolol, carbamazepine, or DOC. • AOPs pre-treatment affected some pharmaceutical removal in BAC filters. • Gaps remain in microbial activity, biofilm roles, and influent effects on BAC operation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108974
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Water Treatment and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of biological activated carbon (BAC) filters for pharmaceutical removal from municipal wastewater: A review on its properties, operational factors, and biofilms

3 citations
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Water Treatment and Disinfection
3.60
article

Implications of biological activated carbon (BAC) filters for pharmaceutical removal from municipal wastewater: A review on its properties, operational factors, and biofilms

article en
3 citations

Abstract

Conventional domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are not currently designed to completely remove organic micro-pollutants (OMPs), specifically pharmaceutical residues, from the water. Biological activated carbon (BAC) filters are applied as a treatment to further remove the residues. This study consists of a systematic review ( n = 158) and cross-study comparison ( n = 17) from studies published between 2011 and 2025, evaluates the performance of BAC filters for treating secondary WWTP effluent, quantifies the roles of different operational parameters to achieve a higher pharmaceutical removal, and identifies research gaps in understanding BAC filter performance. In total, 77 BAC filter performance data sets were extracted from studies. An increase in EBCT showed significance in removing diclofenac but not for atenolol, carbamazepine, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). A higher removal of atenolol, carbamazepine, and diclofenac was observed with advanced oxygen oxidation processes (AOPs) pre-treatment to BAC filters, such as ozonation. Other operational parameters, such as physico-chemical characteristics of carbon, aeration, and backwash practice, are also discussed in this review. Future research that could be impactful in BAC filter optimization includes the assessment of microbial activity and its characterization, the role of biofilm, and the effects of influent compositions on the removal of pharmaceutical removal. • Review and cross-study comparison reveal BAC filter performance for WWTP effluent. • Biofilms on GAC support long-term operation of BAC filters. • EBCT improved diclofenac removal, not atenolol, carbamazepine, or DOC. • AOPs pre-treatment affected some pharmaceutical removal in BAC filters. • Gaps remain in microbial activity, biofilm roles, and influent effects on BAC operation.

Journal of Water Process EngineeringVol. 79
University of Groningen (NL), Water Technology (Australia) (AU)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Water Treatment and Disinfection
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.