Computer Assisted Diagnosis: does it make sense for Lungs Tumor Detection? A Qualitative study with Pulmonologists.

This study presents the evaluation by 10 pulmonologists of a diagnostic support system for lung cancer detection through optical endoscopy based on deep learning techniques. The evaluation relies on semi-structured interviews and System Usability Scale (SUS) tests to analyze the utility, reliability, and acceptability of this device during patient procedures. The results reveal a good SUS score, which is better than the vast majority of evaluated systems (88th percentile). Furthermore, the assessment highlights the absence of cognitive biases commonly associated with medical artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Our contribution is structured around three axes: the validation of an assistance system by clinical experts, the evaluation of potential biases during the use of AI tools in interventional pulmonology, and concrete recommendations for the design of medical diagnostic support interfaces. These findings emphasize the potential of assistance systems to improve early detection of lung cancer while preserving the decision-making autonomy of practitioners.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3765712.3765718
Primary Topic
Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computer Assisted Diagnosis: does it make sense for Lungs Tumor Detection? A Qualitative study with Pulmonologists.

Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
article

Computer Assisted Diagnosis: does it make sense for Lungs Tumor Detection? A Qualitative study with Pulmonologists.

article en

Abstract

This study presents the evaluation by 10 pulmonologists of a diagnostic support system for lung cancer detection through optical endoscopy based on deep learning techniques. The evaluation relies on semi-structured interviews and System Usability Scale (SUS) tests to analyze the utility, reliability, and acceptability of this device during patient procedures. The results reveal a good SUS score, which is better than the vast majority of evaluated systems (88th percentile). Furthermore, the assessment highlights the absence of cognitive biases commonly associated with medical artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Our contribution is structured around three axes: the validation of an assistance system by clinical experts, the evaluation of potential biases during the use of AI tools in interventional pulmonology, and concrete recommendations for the design of medical diagnostic support interfaces. These findings emphasize the potential of assistance systems to improve early detection of lung cancer while preserving the decision-making autonomy of practitioners.

Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), University of Namur (BE), Grand Charleroi Hospital (BE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen (FR), Université de Rouen Normandie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.