Dependability Assurance with Symbolic Reasoning in LLM-enabled Systems

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) creates new opportunities in cyber-physical systems, particularly in natural language interaction and decision support. However, the safety-critical nature of these systems requires LLMs to operate in a deterministic, verifiable, and reliable way. The proposed solution in the paper combines the flexibility of LLMs with the deterministic capabilities of formal approaches based on symbolic logic reasoning. The LLMs’ structured outputs generated are processed by a logic reasoning engine capable of handling contradictions, priorities, and fault-tolerance patterns. This validation process enables formally valid and auditable LLM-based decisions, even when different models produce conflicting outputs. The proposed approach is illustrated through case studies that demonstrate practical examples of symbolic evaluation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17469105
Primary Topic
Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dependability Assurance with Symbolic Reasoning in LLM-enabled Systems

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
article

Dependability Assurance with Symbolic Reasoning in LLM-enabled Systems

article en

Abstract

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) creates new opportunities in cyber-physical systems, particularly in natural language interaction and decision support. However, the safety-critical nature of these systems requires LLMs to operate in a deterministic, verifiable, and reliable way. The proposed solution in the paper combines the flexibility of LLMs with the deterministic capabilities of formal approaches based on symbolic logic reasoning. The LLMs’ structured outputs generated are processed by a logic reasoning engine capable of handling contradictions, priorities, and fault-tolerance patterns. This validation process enables formally valid and auditable LLM-based decisions, even when different models produce conflicting outputs. The proposed approach is illustrated through case studies that demonstrate practical examples of symbolic evaluation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.