Algorithmic Bias and Ethical Challenges in AI-Driven Business Decision-Making: A Comparative Perspective Between the U.S. and Africa/MENA

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a powerful tool in business decision-making, offering companies new ways to enhance efficiency, improve predictions, and automate tasks. However, as AI becomes more deeply integrated into business operations, concerns about algorithmic bias and ethical challenges continue to grow. AI models, trained on historical data, can sometimes reinforce biases, leading to unintended consequences in areas such as hiring, financial decision-making, and risk assessment. The way these issues play out differs significantly between developed economies like the United States and emerging markets in Africa and the MENA region. This paper explores how algorithmic bias affects decision-making in these two different contexts, focusing on key differences in regulations, corporate governance, and the availability of reliable data. In the U.S., businesses operate within established legal frameworks, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and AI ethics guidelines from institutions like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which encourage accountability and responsible AI use. On the other hand, in Africa and the MENA region, businesses face additional challenges such as limited access to high-quality local data, evolving regulations, and a dependence on AI models developed in Western contexts, which may not always align with local realities. These factors can create inefficiencies, reinforce existing inequalities, and make fair decision-making more difficult. Through case studies from both regions, this paper highlights the risks associated with AI-driven bias and offers practical recommendations for businesses and policymakers. The findings suggest that strengthening regulations, promoting locally relevant AI solutions, and emphasizing ethical AI practices can help organizations make better and fairer decisions in the long run.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17465455
Primary Topic
Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Bias and Ethical Challenges in AI-Driven Business Decision-Making: A Comparative Perspective Between the U.S. and Africa/MENA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
article

Algorithmic Bias and Ethical Challenges in AI-Driven Business Decision-Making: A Comparative Perspective Between the U.S. and Africa/MENA

article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a powerful tool in business decision-making, offering companies new ways to enhance efficiency, improve predictions, and automate tasks. However, as AI becomes more deeply integrated into business operations, concerns about algorithmic bias and ethical challenges continue to grow. AI models, trained on historical data, can sometimes reinforce biases, leading to unintended consequences in areas such as hiring, financial decision-making, and risk assessment. The way these issues play out differs significantly between developed economies like the United States and emerging markets in Africa and the MENA region. This paper explores how algorithmic bias affects decision-making in these two different contexts, focusing on key differences in regulations, corporate governance, and the availability of reliable data. In the U.S., businesses operate within established legal frameworks, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and AI ethics guidelines from institutions like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which encourage accountability and responsible AI use. On the other hand, in Africa and the MENA region, businesses face additional challenges such as limited access to high-quality local data, evolving regulations, and a dependence on AI models developed in Western contexts, which may not always align with local realities. These factors can create inefficiencies, reinforce existing inequalities, and make fair decision-making more difficult. Through case studies from both regions, this paper highlights the risks associated with AI-driven bias and offers practical recommendations for businesses and policymakers. The findings suggest that strengthening regulations, promoting locally relevant AI solutions, and emphasizing ethical AI practices can help organizations make better and fairer decisions in the long run.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mohammed V University (MA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.