Mechanistic Promiscuity in Cobalt‐Mediated CO2 Reduction Reaction: One‐ Versus Two‐Electron Reduction Process

We compare the carbon dioxide reduction (CO2RR) activity and selectivity of the complexes [(Hbbpya)CoII]2+ and [(Mebbpya)CoII]2+, which contain two 2,2′‐bipyridine chelating groups linked by ‐NH or ‐NCH3 moieties, respectively. Whereas [(Hbbpya)CoII]2+ forms CO under electrocatalytic conditions in presence of phenol (PhOH) with high selectivity, [(Mebbpya)CoII]2+ shows higher hydrogen evolution reaction activity and low selectivity for CO production. The molecular origin of the difference in product selectivity was analysed based on spectroscopic trapping of reactive intermediates and detailed kinetic and theoretical studies. A difference in mechanism is evident; whereas an efficient proton relay mediated by the ‐NH group initiates a two‐electron reduction of CO2 in the case of [(Hbbpya)CoII]2+, one‐electron chemistry prevails for [(Mebbpya)CoII]2+. Under stopped‐flow conditions, we trapped the one‐electron reduced CO2 radical anion in [(Mebbpya)CoI(CO2−•)], which forms oxalate under aprotic conditions. This study underlines the importance of subtle electronic and protonation changes in controlling the CO2RR product selectivity.

Publication Details

Journal
edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18452/34915
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic Promiscuity in Cobalt‐Mediated CO2 Reduction Reaction: One‐ Versus Two‐Electron Reduction Process

edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
article

Mechanistic Promiscuity in Cobalt‐Mediated CO2 Reduction Reaction: One‐ Versus Two‐Electron Reduction Process

article en

Abstract

We compare the carbon dioxide reduction (CO2RR) activity and selectivity of the complexes [(Hbbpya)CoII]2+ and [(Mebbpya)CoII]2+, which contain two 2,2′‐bipyridine chelating groups linked by ‐NH or ‐NCH3 moieties, respectively. Whereas [(Hbbpya)CoII]2+ forms CO under electrocatalytic conditions in presence of phenol (PhOH) with high selectivity, [(Mebbpya)CoII]2+ shows higher hydrogen evolution reaction activity and low selectivity for CO production. The molecular origin of the difference in product selectivity was analysed based on spectroscopic trapping of reactive intermediates and detailed kinetic and theoretical studies. A difference in mechanism is evident; whereas an efficient proton relay mediated by the ‐NH group initiates a two‐electron reduction of CO2 in the case of [(Hbbpya)CoII]2+, one‐electron chemistry prevails for [(Mebbpya)CoII]2+. Under stopped‐flow conditions, we trapped the one‐electron reduced CO2 radical anion in [(Mebbpya)CoI(CO2−•)], which forms oxalate under aprotic conditions. This study underlines the importance of subtle electronic and protonation changes in controlling the CO2RR product selectivity.

edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.