Evaluating the first joint JEE and PHEPA assessment in the Netherlands: A mixed-methods pilot study

Abstract Issue/problem In January 2025, the Netherlands piloted the first joint assessment of WHO's Joint External Evaluation (JEE) and ECDC's Public Health Emergency Preparedness Assessment (PHEPA), described under Article 8 of the Regulation (EU) 2022/2371. Both tools assess countries’ capacities to prevent, detect, and respond to public health emergencies. The Regulation calls for stronger cooperation with WHO, especially regarding the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005), to streamline capacity assessments and ease EU/EEA Member States’ (MS) reporting burden. Evaluating this pilot is key to informing possible future joint assessments in other MS. Description of the problem The innovation of the joint JEE-PHEPA lies in combining two international public health emergency preparedness assessments into one streamlined process, potentially reducing the workload for MS that decide to conduct both assessments. We conducted a mixed methods evaluation to explore stakeholders’ experiences with the joint JEE-PHEPA and identify barriers and enablers in process, methodology, and future directions to identify challenges and improvements. Results Preliminary results show most stakeholders found the joint approach efficient and complementary, offering richer insights into prevention and preparedness. Recommendations included more preparation time and clarifying recommendation and reporting processes. Stakeholders generally recommended the joint approach for other MS, conditional on available resources and timing. Lessons The joint JEE-PHEPA strengthens national assessments of preparedness and response capacities through incorporation of the all-hazards approach at both regional and international level. It combines technical expertise from ECDC, WHO, and other MS, reduces duplication of efforts, and contributes to efficient use of resources. Success requires clear guidance, strong stakeholder engagement, and better integration of the two methodologies. Key messages • The joint JEE-PHEPA provides additional insights into public health emergency preparedness while reducing the workload for MS that decide to conduct both assessments. • The joint JEE-PHEPA is considered beneficial for MS which want to conduct a voluntary JEE. However, effective implementation necessitates clear guidance, feasible timelines, and sufficient resources.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1643
Primary Topic
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the first joint JEE and PHEPA assessment in the Netherlands: A mixed-methods pilot study

European Journal of Public Health
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
article

Evaluating the first joint JEE and PHEPA assessment in the Netherlands: A mixed-methods pilot study

article en

Abstract

Abstract Issue/problem In January 2025, the Netherlands piloted the first joint assessment of WHO's Joint External Evaluation (JEE) and ECDC's Public Health Emergency Preparedness Assessment (PHEPA), described under Article 8 of the Regulation (EU) 2022/2371. Both tools assess countries’ capacities to prevent, detect, and respond to public health emergencies. The Regulation calls for stronger cooperation with WHO, especially regarding the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005), to streamline capacity assessments and ease EU/EEA Member States’ (MS) reporting burden. Evaluating this pilot is key to informing possible future joint assessments in other MS. Description of the problem The innovation of the joint JEE-PHEPA lies in combining two international public health emergency preparedness assessments into one streamlined process, potentially reducing the workload for MS that decide to conduct both assessments. We conducted a mixed methods evaluation to explore stakeholders’ experiences with the joint JEE-PHEPA and identify barriers and enablers in process, methodology, and future directions to identify challenges and improvements. Results Preliminary results show most stakeholders found the joint approach efficient and complementary, offering richer insights into prevention and preparedness. Recommendations included more preparation time and clarifying recommendation and reporting processes. Stakeholders generally recommended the joint approach for other MS, conditional on available resources and timing. Lessons The joint JEE-PHEPA strengthens national assessments of preparedness and response capacities through incorporation of the all-hazards approach at both regional and international level. It combines technical expertise from ECDC, WHO, and other MS, reduces duplication of efforts, and contributes to efficient use of resources. Success requires clear guidance, strong stakeholder engagement, and better integration of the two methodologies. Key messages • The joint JEE-PHEPA provides additional insights into public health emergency preparedness while reducing the workload for MS that decide to conduct both assessments. • The joint JEE-PHEPA is considered beneficial for MS which want to conduct a voluntary JEE. However, effective implementation necessitates clear guidance, feasible timelines, and sufficient resources.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Office of Readiness and Response (US), World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (DK)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.