Human–AI Collaboration for Automated Classification of Online Information Sources on Cervical Cancer

Abstract Background The landscape of cancer information has expanded across diverse online platforms. However, traditional methods such as manual coding are limited in their ability to efficiently identify information sources in large-scale datasets. This study introduces a novel approach that employs prompt engineering to automatically and thematically classify sources of online information on cervical cancer. Methods We identified 1,877 Korean online communities-referred to as “cafés"-that provide cervical cancer information. An initial codebook was developed using a zero-shot approach with GPT-4o. Two human coders then reviewed a sample of 500 cafés and iteratively added categories until reaching theoretical saturation, thereby refining the initial codebook. To validate the finalized version, which consisted of twelve categories, a separate sample of 200 cafés was independently coded by two coders (Cohen's kappa = 0.82; 95% CI [0.76-0.88]). We then structured a prompt for the automated classification of the full dataset. Results The prompts followed a step-by-step structure consisting of (1) main keywords for classification and (2) specific instructions. An initial prompt was applied to GPT-4o and demonstrated acceptable agreement with human coders (Krippendorff's α = 0.84, 95% CI [0.82-0.86] for the full dataset). The finalized prompt that contained additional detailed instructions was applied to GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro. The results demonstrated a substantial agreement among human coders, GPT-4o, and Gemini 1.5 Pro (Krippendorff's α = 0.81; 95% CI [0.80-0.83]). Conclusions This study highlights the potential of human-AI collaboration in large-scale thematic classification. By integrating the efficiency of AI with human oversight, the proposed approach enhances both methodological validity and interpretive reliability. It offers a scalable pathway for future research in public health, infodemiology, and health communication. Key messages • Generative AI models (GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro) can reliably replicate human coding judgments in multi-category classification tasks when guided by a structured prompt. • Human–AI collaboration effectively supports the identification of key information sources in cancer infodemiology by combining AI efficiency with human oversight.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1116
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human–AI Collaboration for Automated Classification of Online Information Sources on Cervical Cancer

European Journal of Public Health
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

Human–AI Collaboration for Automated Classification of Online Information Sources on Cervical Cancer

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The landscape of cancer information has expanded across diverse online platforms. However, traditional methods such as manual coding are limited in their ability to efficiently identify information sources in large-scale datasets. This study introduces a novel approach that employs prompt engineering to automatically and thematically classify sources of online information on cervical cancer. Methods We identified 1,877 Korean online communities-referred to as “cafés"-that provide cervical cancer information. An initial codebook was developed using a zero-shot approach with GPT-4o. Two human coders then reviewed a sample of 500 cafés and iteratively added categories until reaching theoretical saturation, thereby refining the initial codebook. To validate the finalized version, which consisted of twelve categories, a separate sample of 200 cafés was independently coded by two coders (Cohen's kappa = 0.82; 95% CI [0.76-0.88]). We then structured a prompt for the automated classification of the full dataset. Results The prompts followed a step-by-step structure consisting of (1) main keywords for classification and (2) specific instructions. An initial prompt was applied to GPT-4o and demonstrated acceptable agreement with human coders (Krippendorff's α = 0.84, 95% CI [0.82-0.86] for the full dataset). The finalized prompt that contained additional detailed instructions was applied to GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro. The results demonstrated a substantial agreement among human coders, GPT-4o, and Gemini 1.5 Pro (Krippendorff's α = 0.81; 95% CI [0.80-0.83]). Conclusions This study highlights the potential of human-AI collaboration in large-scale thematic classification. By integrating the efficiency of AI with human oversight, the proposed approach enhances both methodological validity and interpretive reliability. It offers a scalable pathway for future research in public health, infodemiology, and health communication. Key messages • Generative AI models (GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro) can reliably replicate human coding judgments in multi-category classification tasks when guided by a structured prompt. • Human–AI collaboration effectively supports the identification of key information sources in cancer infodemiology by combining AI efficiency with human oversight.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Kongju National University (KR), National Cancer Center (US), National Cancer Center (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.