Perceived ease of managing information on mental health–development of a mental health literacy tool

Abstract Background Health literacy (HL) and mental health literacy (MHL) research have evolved separately, with HL focusing on navigating health information and MHL emphasizing knowledge on mental illnesses, help-seeking, and stigma. Since findings from HL and MHL studies are hardly comparable, we developed a tool bridging both traditions, aligning with current HL research while addressing mental health. Methods The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) was adapted to reflect scenarios related to mental health while preserving its model of 4 competences (access, understand, appraise, apply information) and 3 domains (mental illness treatment, prevention, well-being promotion). 12 experts reviewed the items. The resulting 24-item MHLS-GER-Q24, measuring perceived difficulty on a 4-point Likert scale, was used in a representative online survey of internet users in Germany. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the underlying model, supplemented by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α. Results The MHLS-GER-Q24 showed high internal consistency (α = .96) in a survey of n = 2007. CFA did not display sufficient fit for either of the mentioned 4-factor or 3-factor solutions related to competences and domains. EFA suggests an alternative 3-factor solution, with one factor explaining ∼49% of variance. Mean score was 2.42 (1 = “very difficult” to 4 = “very easy"), and 54.3% of responses indicated dealing with mental health information was “very difficult” or “rather difficult." Conclusions While the MHLS-GER-Q24 displays high internal consistency, its presumed factor structure could not be confirmed. Also, high internal consistency suggests potential for a short version, which is being developed taking into account results from EFA. Participants found it particularly challenging to manage mental health information, suggesting the need for MHL promotion and more manageable mental health information. Key messages • The MHLS-GER-Q24 is a promising tool bridging HL and MHL research. • The scenarios on dealing with mental health information are considered difficult in 54% of responses.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1928
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived ease of managing information on mental health–development of a mental health literacy tool

European Journal of Public Health
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Perceived ease of managing information on mental health–development of a mental health literacy tool

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Health literacy (HL) and mental health literacy (MHL) research have evolved separately, with HL focusing on navigating health information and MHL emphasizing knowledge on mental illnesses, help-seeking, and stigma. Since findings from HL and MHL studies are hardly comparable, we developed a tool bridging both traditions, aligning with current HL research while addressing mental health. Methods The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) was adapted to reflect scenarios related to mental health while preserving its model of 4 competences (access, understand, appraise, apply information) and 3 domains (mental illness treatment, prevention, well-being promotion). 12 experts reviewed the items. The resulting 24-item MHLS-GER-Q24, measuring perceived difficulty on a 4-point Likert scale, was used in a representative online survey of internet users in Germany. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the underlying model, supplemented by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α. Results The MHLS-GER-Q24 showed high internal consistency (α = .96) in a survey of n = 2007. CFA did not display sufficient fit for either of the mentioned 4-factor or 3-factor solutions related to competences and domains. EFA suggests an alternative 3-factor solution, with one factor explaining ∼49% of variance. Mean score was 2.42 (1 = “very difficult” to 4 = “very easy"), and 54.3% of responses indicated dealing with mental health information was “very difficult” or “rather difficult." Conclusions While the MHLS-GER-Q24 displays high internal consistency, its presumed factor structure could not be confirmed. Also, high internal consistency suggests potential for a short version, which is being developed taking into account results from EFA. Participants found it particularly challenging to manage mental health information, suggesting the need for MHL promotion and more manageable mental health information. Key messages • The MHLS-GER-Q24 is a promising tool bridging HL and MHL research. • The scenarios on dealing with mental health information are considered difficult in 54% of responses.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perceived ease of managing information on mental health–development of a mental health literacy tool · European Journal of Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS