Employment status, psycholocigal distress and gender - population-based cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Our aim was to investigate factors contributing to psychological distress in the working population, with a special reference to non-stardard employment statuses and gender. Methods Questionnaire data was from the nationally representative Finnish Regional Health and Well-being Study from 2012-2016 (aged 20 +, n = 37,689, response rate 53%), Psychological distress was assessed using MHI-5 (cut-off value < =52). We studied the following factors potentially associated with psychological distress: sociodemographic, family-related, work-related, work-family balance, lifestyle-related and given and received support. We used logistic regression analysis to examine association between the factors and the psychological distress. Results Women reported more psychological distress than men (12.1% vs. 9.8%, respectively, p < 0.001). Women and men in part-time jobs (14.9% and 15%, respectively, p < 0.001) and women and men in fixed-term contracts (14% and 11.8%, respectively, p < 0.001) reported more psychological distress than others. After adjusting for sociodemographic, work, family and work-family balance variables, women in part-time jobs (OR 1.23, CI95% 1.01-1.51) reported more distress than women working full-time, and women on fixed-term contracts reported more distress than women on permanent contracts (OR 1.26, CI95% 1.05-1.50). Men in part-time work did not report statistically significantly more distress than men in full-time, but men on fixed-term contracts reported more distress than on permanent contracts (OR 1.31, CI95% 1.00-1.72). The effect of part-time or fixed-term work lost statistical significance when lifestyle-related risk factors, social participation and support were taken into account. Conclusions Working on fixed-term contracts was associated with psychological distress in both genders and working part-time only in women. However, this may be confouded by having more other risk factors of and less protective factors against psychological distress. Key messages • Non-standard work was associated with higher psychological distress after adjusting for sociodemographic, family- and work-related and lifestyle factors in women and fixed-term contracts also in men. • Access to occupational health services should be ensured for those working on non-standard contracts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1021
Primary Topic
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employment status, psycholocigal distress and gender - population-based cross-sectional study

European Journal of Public Health
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
article

Employment status, psycholocigal distress and gender - population-based cross-sectional study

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Our aim was to investigate factors contributing to psychological distress in the working population, with a special reference to non-stardard employment statuses and gender. Methods Questionnaire data was from the nationally representative Finnish Regional Health and Well-being Study from 2012-2016 (aged 20 +, n = 37,689, response rate 53%), Psychological distress was assessed using MHI-5 (cut-off value < =52). We studied the following factors potentially associated with psychological distress: sociodemographic, family-related, work-related, work-family balance, lifestyle-related and given and received support. We used logistic regression analysis to examine association between the factors and the psychological distress. Results Women reported more psychological distress than men (12.1% vs. 9.8%, respectively, p < 0.001). Women and men in part-time jobs (14.9% and 15%, respectively, p < 0.001) and women and men in fixed-term contracts (14% and 11.8%, respectively, p < 0.001) reported more psychological distress than others. After adjusting for sociodemographic, work, family and work-family balance variables, women in part-time jobs (OR 1.23, CI95% 1.01-1.51) reported more distress than women working full-time, and women on fixed-term contracts reported more distress than women on permanent contracts (OR 1.26, CI95% 1.05-1.50). Men in part-time work did not report statistically significantly more distress than men in full-time, but men on fixed-term contracts reported more distress than on permanent contracts (OR 1.31, CI95% 1.00-1.72). The effect of part-time or fixed-term work lost statistical significance when lifestyle-related risk factors, social participation and support were taken into account. Conclusions Working on fixed-term contracts was associated with psychological distress in both genders and working part-time only in women. However, this may be confouded by having more other risk factors of and less protective factors against psychological distress. Key messages • Non-standard work was associated with higher psychological distress after adjusting for sociodemographic, family- and work-related and lifestyle factors in women and fixed-term contracts also in men. • Access to occupational health services should be ensured for those working on non-standard contracts.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University of Helsinki (FI), Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), Finland University (FI), Public Health Institute (US), Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FI), Urho Kaleva Kekkonen Institute (FI)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.