Tobacco and Cannabis Use Among Not in Employment, Education or Training Youth: Systematic Review

Abstract Introduction After the 2008 financial crisis and the rise in youth unemployment, a new term was popularised to describe the population of 15-29 years who are ‘Not in Employment, Education or Training’ (referred to as NEETs). This heterogeneous group includes unemployed youth, those with family responsibilities, and those living with illness or disability. The present study aims to characterise tobacco and cannabis use among NEETs, taking into account the heterogeneity of the population. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines was conducted to compare tobacco and cannabis consumption in the NEET population aged 15-29 years with that of other young people. Observational studies examining the association between NEET status and variables ‘current smoker’ and ‘cannabis use’ were included. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Results Twenty-three studies were analysed, comprising a total of 90,853 individuals. NEET status was significantly associated with being a current smoker (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.40-2.34) and cannabis use (OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.77-2.61). The sensitivity analysis by comparison group shows that current smoker status is significantly higher among NEETs compared to students (OR = 3.05, 95% CI = 2.31-4.03), but not significantly different compared to workers (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.91-1.34). Regarding cannabis use, NEETs demonstrated a significantly higher risk compared to both students and workers. Conclusions This study revealed an increased risk of tobacco and cannabis use among NEET youth. Tobacco use may reflect social health inequalities related to educational attainment. Knowing that tobacco and particularly cannabis consumption among NEETs may represent specific risks in relation to mental health, social and professional reintegration, and economic vulnerability, targeted prevention is needed to reduce the impact of social health inequities. Key messages • NEETs face a higher risk of tobacco and cannabis use disorders compared to their peers. • NEET youth consumption reflecting social health inequalities and highlighting the need for targeted prevention to reduce the impacts on mental health, social reintegration, and economic vulnerability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1920
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tobacco and Cannabis Use Among Not in Employment, Education or Training Youth: Systematic Review

European Journal of Public Health
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Tobacco and Cannabis Use Among Not in Employment, Education or Training Youth: Systematic Review

article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction After the 2008 financial crisis and the rise in youth unemployment, a new term was popularised to describe the population of 15-29 years who are ‘Not in Employment, Education or Training’ (referred to as NEETs). This heterogeneous group includes unemployed youth, those with family responsibilities, and those living with illness or disability. The present study aims to characterise tobacco and cannabis use among NEETs, taking into account the heterogeneity of the population. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines was conducted to compare tobacco and cannabis consumption in the NEET population aged 15-29 years with that of other young people. Observational studies examining the association between NEET status and variables ‘current smoker’ and ‘cannabis use’ were included. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Results Twenty-three studies were analysed, comprising a total of 90,853 individuals. NEET status was significantly associated with being a current smoker (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.40-2.34) and cannabis use (OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.77-2.61). The sensitivity analysis by comparison group shows that current smoker status is significantly higher among NEETs compared to students (OR = 3.05, 95% CI = 2.31-4.03), but not significantly different compared to workers (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.91-1.34). Regarding cannabis use, NEETs demonstrated a significantly higher risk compared to both students and workers. Conclusions This study revealed an increased risk of tobacco and cannabis use among NEET youth. Tobacco use may reflect social health inequalities related to educational attainment. Knowing that tobacco and particularly cannabis consumption among NEETs may represent specific risks in relation to mental health, social and professional reintegration, and economic vulnerability, targeted prevention is needed to reduce the impact of social health inequities. Key messages • NEETs face a higher risk of tobacco and cannabis use disorders compared to their peers. • NEET youth consumption reflecting social health inequalities and highlighting the need for targeted prevention to reduce the impacts on mental health, social reintegration, and economic vulnerability.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Clinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours (FR), National Institute for Demographic Studies (FR), Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (FR), Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (France) (FR), Economic & Social Sciences, Health Systems & Medical Informatics (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.